2017
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pentatricopeptide repeat protein EMP9 is required for mitochondrial ccmB and rps4 transcript editing, mitochondrial complex biogenesis and seed development in maize

Abstract: Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins comprise a large family of sequence-specific RNA binding proteins in land plants. Because of its large family size and frequent embryo lethality in the mutants, molecular functions and physiological roles of many PPR proteins are unknown. Through characterization of an empty pericarp9 (emp9) mutant in maize (Zea mays), we defined the functions of EMP9 in mitochondrial RNA editing, respiratory complex formation and seed development. Mu insertions in different regions of E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(118 reference statements)
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we detected partial editing of the cox2 ‐449 site in the emp18‐2 mutant (Fig. a), which is consistent with the previous report that disruption of the E+ domain in EMP5 and EMP9 does not abolish the RNA editing (Liu et al ., ; Yang et al ., ). Another possibility may be that the partner proteins for EMP18 are different in the editing of atp6 ‐635 and cox2 ‐449, and the mutation in emp18‐2 has more severe impact on the interaction with the protein functioning in atp6 ‐635 editing than the protein functioning in cox2 ‐449 editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we detected partial editing of the cox2 ‐449 site in the emp18‐2 mutant (Fig. a), which is consistent with the previous report that disruption of the E+ domain in EMP5 and EMP9 does not abolish the RNA editing (Liu et al ., ; Yang et al ., ). Another possibility may be that the partner proteins for EMP18 are different in the editing of atp6 ‐635 and cox2 ‐449, and the mutation in emp18‐2 has more severe impact on the interaction with the protein functioning in atp6 ‐635 editing than the protein functioning in cox2 ‐449 editing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apart from DYW-PPR proteins, several E-PPR proteins have also been considered to be related to RNA editing at one or several sites in plant mitochondrial transcripts (Takenaka et al, 2010;Hammani et al, 2011;Murayama et al, 2012;Yuan & Liu, 2012;Zhu et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014;Sun F. et al, 2015). These RNA editing sites are mostly located in transcripts encoding proteins of complex I, III or IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and their editing defects often result in partially or completely deficient function of these complexes, and lead to abnormal plant growth or seed development (Kim et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014;Sun F. et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, editing events restore evolutionarily conserved amino acids, which is crucial for proper protein expression, function and regulation. (Chen et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Yang et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although with sequence similarity among the PPR motifs, PPRs exhibit functional distinction and non‐redundancy in assisting the organelle expression and evolutional diversity between monocots and eudicots (Fujii and Small, ; Barkan and Small, ; Manna, ). The PLS (repeat P–L–S motif)‐subfamily PPRs predominantly assist in RNA editing (Takenaka et al ., ; Barkan and Small, ; Li et al ., ; Sun et al ., ; Qi et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Yang et al ., ) and RNA splicing (Chateigner‐Boutin et al ., ; Ichinose et al ., ), whereas the P subfamily PPRs have been functionally characterized in mitochondrial intron splicing (Brown et al ., ; Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Colas des Francs‐Small et al ., ; Hsu et al ., ; Hsieh et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Xiu et al ., ; Cai et al ., ; Qi et al ., ; Ren et al ., ; Dai et al ., ), transcript stabilization (Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Lee et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ), cleavage and translation (Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Haïli et al ., ). Nonetheless, the number of characterized mitochondrial PPRs involved in the splicing of group II introns is very few, especially for the case of mutations leading to embryo lethality which often negates genetic and molecular studies (Barkan and Small, ; Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%