“…Although with sequence similarity among the PPR motifs, PPRs exhibit functional distinction and non‐redundancy in assisting the organelle expression and evolutional diversity between monocots and eudicots (Fujii and Small, ; Barkan and Small, ; Manna, ). The PLS (repeat P–L–S motif)‐subfamily PPRs predominantly assist in RNA editing (Takenaka et al ., ; Barkan and Small, ; Li et al ., ; Sun et al ., ; Qi et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Yang et al ., ) and RNA splicing (Chateigner‐Boutin et al ., ; Ichinose et al ., ), whereas the P subfamily PPRs have been functionally characterized in mitochondrial intron splicing (Brown et al ., ; Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Colas des Francs‐Small et al ., ; Hsu et al ., ; Hsieh et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Xiu et al ., ; Cai et al ., ; Qi et al ., ; Ren et al ., ; Dai et al ., ), transcript stabilization (Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Lee et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ), cleavage and translation (Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ; Haïli et al ., ). Nonetheless, the number of characterized mitochondrial PPRs involved in the splicing of group II introns is very few, especially for the case of mutations leading to embryo lethality which often negates genetic and molecular studies (Barkan and Small, ; Colas des Francs‐Small and Small, ).…”