2003
DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2003.16.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pennsylvania Experience: Public Release of Judge-Specific Sentencing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pennsylvania experimented with making its sentencing information available to the public and the results were favorable. This process reportedly led to better-quality research being conducted on sentencing decisions and provided a basis for president judges, legislators, and the public to evaluate the performance of sentencing judges (Bergstrom & Mistick 2003).…”
Section: Recommendations For Sentencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pennsylvania experimented with making its sentencing information available to the public and the results were favorable. This process reportedly led to better-quality research being conducted on sentencing decisions and provided a basis for president judges, legislators, and the public to evaluate the performance of sentencing judges (Bergstrom & Mistick 2003).…”
Section: Recommendations For Sentencingmentioning
confidence: 99%