1956
DOI: 10.1109/aieepas.1956.4499329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Penetration of Electromagnetic Radiation Into Ferromagnetic Material [includes discussion]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interesting feature is that the pipe impedance is always much less than its de resistance, being approximately only one third to one half of the dc value. The tests figures are considerably lower than the calculated values by Adams' method [2] as shown in Table III. System fault current taken as 10 kA rms (pipe impedance based on 9 kA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interesting feature is that the pipe impedance is always much less than its de resistance, being approximately only one third to one half of the dc value. The tests figures are considerably lower than the calculated values by Adams' method [2] as shown in Table III. System fault current taken as 10 kA rms (pipe impedance based on 9 kA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…(1) The longitudinal voltage induced between the conductor and the sheath in an auxiliary cable is equal to the resistive voltage drop of the sheath current. Thus, by the definition of the screening and coupling factors Is X Rs = krXmI.o (2) Therefore, the resultant screening factor of the auxiliary cable concerned is kr= IRs/IoXm.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation