1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003960050424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pellicular monolith: pore-surface functionalization and surface-phase construction in macroporous polymeric materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(12) where the electron temperature T e is in eV. Between discharge pulses, neutral radical chemistry dominates the mechanism.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(12) where the electron temperature T e is in eV. Between discharge pulses, neutral radical chemistry dominates the mechanism.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface reactivity of the polymer can markedly change even when new chemical groups cover only a small fraction of the surface. The inert pore surfaces of macro-porous PE used in chromatographic columns were treated downstream of the ammonia discharge to make them reactive enough to bind colloidal particles [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies are immobilized on hydrophobic polyethylene (PE) frits with a pore size of 40 μm 19. The inert pore surface of the PE monoliths has to be functionalized to introduce covalently immobilized amine functionalities on the whole pore surface 20. In contrast, the macroporous and hydrophilic polyepoxide monolithic support developed by Peskoller et al has hydroxyl as well as epoxy groups using poly(glycerol‐3‐glycidyl ether) as precursor 21.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drawback can be addressed by the elimination of diffusive pores, which restricts the mass transfer to a thin, retentive layer at the outer surface of the stationary phase, resulting in so-called micropellicular phases [71]. A monolithic column configuration lacking diffusive micro-and mesopores may be adequately described as a micropellicular monolith [72] and has been shown to enable the separation of analytes over a very broad size range with efficiences significantly better compared to those of columns packed with micropellicular granular stationary phases. Miniaturized chromatographic separation systems applying capillary columns of 10±500 lm inner diameter are frequently the method of choice for the separation and characterization of peptides, proteins and nucleid acid mixtures, because very often the amount of available sample material is limited.…”
Section: Properties Of Monolithic Poly(styrene-divinylbenzene)mentioning
confidence: 99%