Abstract:Oncologic resections near the shoulder create challenging reconstructive problems. In addition to severe contour defects and the risk for functional deficits resulting from contractures, there may be exposed bone and peripheral nerves rendering simple skin graft closures suboptimal long term. The lateral arm flap is a versatile septofasciocutaneous flap based on the posterior branch of the radial collateral artery in the lateral intermuscular septum of the upper arm. This paper details our experience with 3 pa… Show more
“…The technique of closing the donor site depends on the width of the flap. Direct closure is usually limited to a maximum width of 6 cm 2 , 5 , 7 . The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect 2 , 5 – 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct closure is usually limited to a maximum width of 6 cm 2 , 5 , 7 . The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect 2 , 5 – 7 . Although the maximum length of the vascular pedicle was 7 to 8 cm, as measured from the insertion of the deltoid muscle, 2 a pedicle length of 12 to 14 cm can be achieved by following the radial nerve proximally and detaching the tendon of the lateral head of the triceps muscle, so that a limited pedicle length does not mean a restriction in the use the lateral upper arm flap 6 , 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral upper arm flap has been increasingly used for small to medium-sized defects because of its pliable nature, ease of harvest, available vascular supply, and minimal donor site morbidity. 2,[5][6][7][8] The flap is potentially sensate, and there is a unique vascular plexus, allowing great variability in design and thus making the lateral upper arm flap one of the most adaptable flaps, not only in head and neck reconstruction but also in hand and upper and lower extremity reconstruction. [7][8][9] The flap can be designed to be up to 15 cm in length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,7 The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect. 2,[5][6][7] Although the maximum length of the vascular pedicle was 7 to 8 cm, as measured from the insertion of the deltoid muscle, 2 a pedicle length of 12 to 14 cm can be achieved by following the radial nerve proximally and detaching the tendon of the lateral head of the triceps muscle, so that a limited pedicle length does not mean a restriction in the use the lateral upper arm flap. 6,7 In this study, 3.02 ± 0.88 large perforators (diameter >0.5 mm) were identified by color Doppler sonography in each upper arm, and most of the perforators were located in the upper region (range, 1.0-6.5 cm) of the external epicondyleof the humerus.…”
Color Doppler sonography can facilitate the preoperative assessment of the origin, course, variations, and locations of the radial collateral artery and therefore may increase the success rate of lateral upper arm flap transfer.
“…The technique of closing the donor site depends on the width of the flap. Direct closure is usually limited to a maximum width of 6 cm 2 , 5 , 7 . The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect 2 , 5 – 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct closure is usually limited to a maximum width of 6 cm 2 , 5 , 7 . The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect 2 , 5 – 7 . Although the maximum length of the vascular pedicle was 7 to 8 cm, as measured from the insertion of the deltoid muscle, 2 a pedicle length of 12 to 14 cm can be achieved by following the radial nerve proximally and detaching the tendon of the lateral head of the triceps muscle, so that a limited pedicle length does not mean a restriction in the use the lateral upper arm flap 6 , 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral upper arm flap has been increasingly used for small to medium-sized defects because of its pliable nature, ease of harvest, available vascular supply, and minimal donor site morbidity. 2,[5][6][7][8] The flap is potentially sensate, and there is a unique vascular plexus, allowing great variability in design and thus making the lateral upper arm flap one of the most adaptable flaps, not only in head and neck reconstruction but also in hand and upper and lower extremity reconstruction. [7][8][9] The flap can be designed to be up to 15 cm in length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,7 The width of the flap can be up to 14 cm, but in this situation, a split skin graft is needed to close the defect. 2,[5][6][7] Although the maximum length of the vascular pedicle was 7 to 8 cm, as measured from the insertion of the deltoid muscle, 2 a pedicle length of 12 to 14 cm can be achieved by following the radial nerve proximally and detaching the tendon of the lateral head of the triceps muscle, so that a limited pedicle length does not mean a restriction in the use the lateral upper arm flap. 6,7 In this study, 3.02 ± 0.88 large perforators (diameter >0.5 mm) were identified by color Doppler sonography in each upper arm, and most of the perforators were located in the upper region (range, 1.0-6.5 cm) of the external epicondyleof the humerus.…”
Color Doppler sonography can facilitate the preoperative assessment of the origin, course, variations, and locations of the radial collateral artery and therefore may increase the success rate of lateral upper arm flap transfer.
“… 12 It may be difficult to identify true surgical-site infections with ADM so patients given oral or intravenous antibiotics alone (Clavien type II) were not included. 13 …”
Background:Prepectoral breast reconstruction is increasingly popular. This study compares complications between 2 subpectoral and 1 prepectoral breast reconstruction technique.Methods:Between 2008 and 2015, 294 two-staged expander breast reconstructions in 213 patients were performed with 1 of 3 surgical techniques: (1) Prepectoral, (2) subpectoral with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling (“Classic”), or (3) subpectoral/subserratus expander placement without ADM (“No ADM”). Demographics, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy were assessed for correlation with Clavien IIIb score outcomes. Follow-up was a minimum of 6 months.Results:Surgical cohorts (n = 165 Prepectoral; n = 77 Classic; n = 52 No ADM) had comparable demographics except Classic had more cardiac disease (P = 0.03), No ADM had higher body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.01), and the Prepectoral group had more nipple-sparing mastectomies (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed higher expander complications with BMI ≥ 40 (P = 0.05), stage 4 breast cancer (P = 0.01), and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.1), whereas implant complications were associated with prior history of radiation (P < 0.01). There was more skin necrosis (P = 0.05) and overall expander complications (P = 0.01) in the Classic cohort, whereas the No ADM group trended toward the lowest expander complications among the 3. Multivariate analysis showed no difference in overall expander complication rates between the 3 groups matching demographics, mastectomy surgery, risks, and surgical technique.Conclusions:Prepectoral and subpectoral Classic and No ADM breast reconstructions demonstrated comparable grade IIIb Clavien score complications. BMI > 40, stage 4 cancer, and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were associated with adverse expander outcomes and a prior history of radiation therapy adversely impacted implant outcomes. Ninety-day follow-up for expander and implant complications may be a better National Surgical Quality Improvement Program measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.