2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: An Evaluation of Its Reliability and Validity for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pediatric Quality of Life scale (Peds QL) was used as a measure of the health-related quality of life; healthy children have a mean of total score of 88 (SD 12) (Varni et al 2001). This has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in children after TBI and musculoskeletal trauma (McCarthy et al 2005;McCarthy et al 2006). Standardized scores were calculated and used in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric Quality of Life scale (Peds QL) was used as a measure of the health-related quality of life; healthy children have a mean of total score of 88 (SD 12) (Varni et al 2001). This has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in children after TBI and musculoskeletal trauma (McCarthy et al 2005;McCarthy et al 2006). Standardized scores were calculated and used in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses were obtained via a semistructured interview guide based on 5 open-ended questions (Appendix). The interview guide was based on the work of Varni et al 2 and McCarthy et al, 23 who studied the effect of acute and chronic conditions, including TBIs, on child and teen quality of life. The interview questions were reviewed for word structure and level of language by an independent researcher with experience in qualitative research using structured and semistructured interviews in rehabilitation counseling.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sensitive, domain-specific instruments that have been validated for use in pediatric acquired brain injuries include measures of gross motor function, 21 functional independence, 22,23 health-related quality of life 24 and neuropsychological function. 25 Recent consensus statements 26 have suggested standardized "core data elements" that should be captured by all rehabilitation re searchers to allow the comparison and aggregation of rehabilitation outcomes.…”
Section: What Factors Determine Outcome After Acquired Brain Injury?mentioning
confidence: 99%