2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1629304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pecking Order, Trade-Off, Signaling, and Market-Timing Theories of Capital Structure: A Review

Abstract: Abstract. This paper surveys 4 major capital structure theories: trade-off, pecking order, signaling and market timing. For each theory, a basic model and its major implications are presented. These implications are compared to the available evidence. This is followed by an overview of pros and cons for each theory. A discussion of major recent papers and suggestions for future research are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various theories have been developed over these years, offering determinants of leverage and decision making of firms on their capital structure, though the empirical analyses of these theories have sometimes offered conflicting results. Some of these theories included pecking order theory, trade-off theory, signalling theory, managerial timing theory etc (Miglo, 2010). In some other theories, the concept of "dynamic capital structure" was introduced which endeavoured to overcome the limitation of static or one-period capital structure models (Sorokina, 2014).…”
Section: The Evolution Of Capital Structure Theories Of Firms and Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various theories have been developed over these years, offering determinants of leverage and decision making of firms on their capital structure, though the empirical analyses of these theories have sometimes offered conflicting results. Some of these theories included pecking order theory, trade-off theory, signalling theory, managerial timing theory etc (Miglo, 2010). In some other theories, the concept of "dynamic capital structure" was introduced which endeavoured to overcome the limitation of static or one-period capital structure models (Sorokina, 2014).…”
Section: The Evolution Of Capital Structure Theories Of Firms and Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ahmadinia et al (2012) pecking theory is the consequence of asymmetric information; it does not take an optimal capital structure as a starting point. Information asymmetries exist in almost every facet of corporate finance and they significantly complicate the managers' ability to maximize firm values (Miglo, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980-s and 1990-s, several researches on capital structure were conducted with reference to the STT and POT theory. In Miglo (2010), two study groups were noted, one that is pro and the other is against the POT theory. The group that was pro POT included Myers (1984), Baskin (1989), Allen (1993 and Adedeji (1998), meanwhile the contra group included Shyam-Sunders and Myers (1999) and Frank and Goyale (2003).…”
Section: Static Trade-off and Pecking Order Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2002) and Hovakimian (2005). The pro and contra on the Market Timing Theory, according to behavioralists such as Kant (2003) and Miglo (2010), is due to the internal condition of the firm and external factors (capital market situation). Those that are in favor of MTT maintain that the capital market creates an investor sentiment whereas the internal condition of the company affects the management's action in making financial decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation