2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PCO process for photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, with Fe 3+ or Cu 2+ concentration increasing from 0 to 0.02 mol/L, Hg 0 removal efficiency increases from 8.3% to 100% and from 8.3% to 91.3%, respectively. Related results indicate that Hg 0 in flue gas can be oxidized to Hg 2+ by Å OH according to the following reaction (2) [1,[9][10][11][12]23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, with Fe 3+ or Cu 2+ concentration increasing from 0 to 0.02 mol/L, Hg 0 removal efficiency increases from 8.3% to 100% and from 8.3% to 91.3%, respectively. Related results indicate that Hg 0 in flue gas can be oxidized to Hg 2+ by Å OH according to the following reaction (2) [1,[9][10][11][12]23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some results show that elemental mercury can be captured by adsorption of various adsorbents such as carbon-based materials, metal oxides, silica gel, biomass coke/ash, calcium-based materials, and natural mineral materials [2][3][4][5]. In addition, elemental mercury can be also effectively captured by various oxidation techniques [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The basic principle is that elemental mercury in flue gas is first oxidized to divalent mercury, and then is washed in existing wet flue gas desulfurization devices [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many technologies have been developed for mercury control (Biswas et al, 1999), such as injecting powdered activated carbon to adsorb mercury (Sjostrom et al, 2010;Clack, 2012), injecting halogen reagents (Zhao et al, 2006) and using UV light and ozone to realize mercury oxidization (Wu et al, 1998;Granite and Pennline 2002;Lee et al, 2004;McLarnon et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2007;Yang et al, 2012). Non-thermal plasma operated at atmospheric pressure is one of the promising technologies for converting gaseous elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) to oxidized mercury (Hg 2+ ) and particulate bound mercury (Hg p ) (Chen et al, 2006;Byun et al, 2011a), which can then be effectively removed by conventional air-pollution control devices (Clack, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%