2015
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The payers' perspective on gene therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most of the gene therapy programmes remain in the early stages of development, healthcare economists are generating models to cost treatments, which might provide lifelong cures. A pay-for-performance system has been proposed with yearly-capped annuity paid to the pharmaceutical company if criteria of a metabolic control of the disease are met (Touchot and Flume 2015). These criteria might reflect cost-effectiveness and not only cost-saving.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of the gene therapy programmes remain in the early stages of development, healthcare economists are generating models to cost treatments, which might provide lifelong cures. A pay-for-performance system has been proposed with yearly-capped annuity paid to the pharmaceutical company if criteria of a metabolic control of the disease are met (Touchot and Flume 2015). These criteria might reflect cost-effectiveness and not only cost-saving.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore likely that price structures and valuation models may change in the future. For example, payers have suggested innovative pricing strategies for gene therapies which may lead to price levels that are more sustainable in the long term [55]. The question of how to fund new therapies equitably is a major issue at present, and is likely to become even more challenging in the future, with the advent of expensive, innovative, breakthrough treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell and gene therapies have very high price (22,23) making challenging for public and private healthcare systems to provide coverage of those product. (24,25) Alipogene tiparvovec was withdrawn from the market in 2017 after the Health Technology Assessment agencies of Germany and France rejected public health insurance coverage of this therapy indicated for lipoprotein lipase deficiency, an ultra-rare disease in Europe. (26,27) And the product was not assessed for public health insurance coverage in any other European country.…”
Section: Market Discontinuations Of Cell and Gene Therapy Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%