2012
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.1300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The patient‐perceived difficulty in diabetes treatment (PDDT) scale identifies barriers to care

Abstract: The PDDT scale is a simple and valid instrument that may assist in identifying potential barriers in adherence to recommended treatments and to new treatment options.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results align with studies from other jurisdictions noting an association between cost and glycemic control [17, 29, 30]. Financial barriers increase the risk of non-adherence and are associated with higher utilization of acute care services among chronic disease patients [18, 31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results align with studies from other jurisdictions noting an association between cost and glycemic control [17, 29, 30]. Financial barriers increase the risk of non-adherence and are associated with higher utilization of acute care services among chronic disease patients [18, 31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…) or the Patient‐perceived Difficulty in Diabetes Treatment Scale (PDDT) (Tamir et al . ), up to 14, as in the Diabetes Care Profile (Fitzgerald et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions Instruments were very heterogeneous in number of items, scales of measurement and dimensions. The range of dimensions went from one, as in the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) (Polonsky et al 1995, Welch et al 1997, the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale (DMSES, UK version) (Sturt et al 2010) or the Patientperceived Difficulty in Diabetes Treatment Scale (PDDT) (Tamir et al 2012), up to 14, as in the Diabetes Care Profile (Fitzgerald et al 1996).…”
Section: Dimensions and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial sample comprised 988 adult diabetic patients receiving care in 25 primary care clinics (55% of patients) and multi-disciplinary diabetesspecialized clinics (45% of patients) across Israel, who had been surveyed about their diabetes treatment modality-related perception, attitudes, and quality of life [14]. In our analysis, we aimed to evaluate alternative hypoglycemic pharmaceutical approaches for the orally-treated patients.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%