2016
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Patient Outcomes Research To Advance Learning (PORTAL) Network Adult Overweight and Obesity Cohort: Development and Description

Abstract: BackgroundThe Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) created a new national network infrastructure to enable large-scale observational comparative effectiveness research across diverse clinical care settings. As part of testing the feasibility of this effort, each clinical data research network (CDRN) was required to construct cohorts of patients, including one of patients with overweight and obesity.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to report on the development of the Patient Outcomes Research t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these sites, a cohort of adults with overweight and obesity was constructed to enable large‐scale observational research across diverse clinical care settings. The development and description of this cohort have been previously published . For all sites except Denver Health, plan members aged > 18 years with at least 12 months of continuous membership between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015, who were not pregnant, and who had a weight and height recorded in the EHR during the inclusion period were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these sites, a cohort of adults with overweight and obesity was constructed to enable large‐scale observational research across diverse clinical care settings. The development and description of this cohort have been previously published . For all sites except Denver Health, plan members aged > 18 years with at least 12 months of continuous membership between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015, who were not pregnant, and who had a weight and height recorded in the EHR during the inclusion period were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PORTAL overweight/obesity cohort was previously described elsewhere . For this study, we included adults older than 18 years and, for all race/ethnicities except Asians, those with a body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ) ≥25.0 recorded in their electronic health record in 2012 or 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The PORTAL overweight/obesity cohort was previously described elsewhere. 16 For this study, we included adults older than 18 years and, for all race/ethnicities except Asians, those with a body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ) ≥25.0 recorded in their electronic health record in 2012 or 2013. For Asians, we included those with BMI ≥23.0, using the World Health Organization overweight/obesity cut point recommendations for Asians.…”
Section: Data For This Study Come From Patient Outcomes Research To Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aims of the project were to: 1) estimate the willingness of individuals to be contacted about research activities, as well as their response rate; 2) obtain information on the attitudes of parents and adults of child bearing age about research, including participation of their child/ren; 3) gain insight into participant attitudes about the use of gathered data for both local and national research; 4) explore the impact of various demographic factors on survey outcomes and survey response rate; 5) examine if there are differences between individuals across various weight classes; 5) determine if there are regional variations in all of the above. Although previous studies have been published on adult obesity using a PCORI funded CDRN [4], these studies were retrospective in nature reporting on the number of patients in the network who met certain criteria. In contrast, the GPC HMRFS not only gathered retrospective data on individuals who met certain specific inclusion criteria but also contacted a random group of individuals from this sub-sample at each site with a survey invitation.…”
Section: Gpc Member Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%