1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00233396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pathways responsible for excitation and inhibition of fastigial neurones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have suggested that different components of sensory responses in the DCN result from sequential inputs from the trigeminal nuclei, inferior olive, and cerebral cortex (Armstrong et al 1973(Armstrong et al , 1975bEccles et al 1974), although a possible component of postinhibitory rebound was also mentioned (Armstrong et al 1973). The potential for strong postinhibitory rebounds of DCN neurons was later confirmed in brain slice recordings (Aizenman and Linden 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have suggested that different components of sensory responses in the DCN result from sequential inputs from the trigeminal nuclei, inferior olive, and cerebral cortex (Armstrong et al 1973(Armstrong et al , 1975bEccles et al 1974), although a possible component of postinhibitory rebound was also mentioned (Armstrong et al 1973). The potential for strong postinhibitory rebounds of DCN neurons was later confirmed in brain slice recordings (Aizenman and Linden 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different combinations and different amplitudes of these response components were present in different neurons, but each neuron showed a stable temporal response pattern. This gave the overall impression that each DCN neuron was tuned to emit a specific response pattern regardless of stimulus condition.Previous studies have suggested that different components of sensory responses in the DCN result from sequential inputs from the trigeminal nuclei, inferior olive, and cerebral cortex (Armstrong et al 1973(Armstrong et al , 1975bEccles et al 1974), although a possible component of postinhibitory rebound was also mentioned (Armstrong et al 1973). The potential for strong postinhibitory rebounds of DCN neurons was later confirmed in brain slice recordings (Aizenman and Linden 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the reproducible responses of directly stimulated individual neurons consist of precisely timed single action potentials (APs) or trains of APs under specific conditions (Bryant and Segundo 1976;Mainen and Sejnowski 1995; but see Gal et al 2010), stimulation in recurrent networks elicits multiphasic responses. These typically consist of: 1) a fast excitatory component of precise and reliable firing by antidromic or monosynaptic activation of local neurons with delays between 2 and 20 ms, 2) a transition phase with low activity thought to be mediated by inhibitory neurons, and 3) a delayed excitatory component driven by recurrent polysynaptic activation (Butovas and Schwarz 2003;Eccles et al 1974;Fanselow and Nicolelis 1999;Rowland and Jaeger 2008;Wagenaar et al 2004). More physiological sensory responses induced by, e.g., foot tapping, whisker deflection, or air puffs unfold comparable dynamics in various brain regions of awake and anesthetized animals (Cody et al 1981;Fanselow and Nicolelis 1999;Rowland and Jaeger 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both electrophysiological (1,8,17) and morphological (7,8,17,34) studies have demonstrated that IOc neurons project to the contralateral cerebellar deep nuclei, especially the FN, directly via the collaterals of climbing fibers or indirectly through the cerebellar Purkinje cells. The rostral FN (FNr) has been well documented to play an important role in cardiorespiratory modulation.…”
Section: Nl N-methyl-d-aspartate) Stimulation Of the Vioc Augmented Vmentioning
confidence: 99%