2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pathway Coexpression Network: Revealing pathway relationships

Abstract: A goal of genomics is to understand the relationships between biological processes. Pathways contribute to functional interplay within biological processes through complex but poorly understood interactions. However, limited functional references for global pathway relationships exist. Pathways from databases such as KEGG and Reactome provide discrete annotations of biological processes. Their relationships are currently either inferred from gene set enrichment within specific experiments, or by simple overlap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let G S i and G S j denote two pathways, and then the genes in GSiGSj can be partitioned into three nonoverlapped sets, namely, GSiGSj (shared genes), G S i \ G S j (genes in G S i only), and G S j \ G S i (genes in G S j only), and then the following measure can be used to adjust the effect of GSiGSj PCoradj(GSi,GSj)=PCor(GSi,GSj\GSi)+PCor(GSj,GSi\GSj)2. In general, by the adjustment above, the pathways with significant amount of shared genes (e.g., DNA Replication pathway and Cell Cycle pathway) will be assigned with a much weaker correlation, which removes the bias due to redundant annotations. Figure shows an example of three pathways ( Cell Cycle Mitotic , Recruitment of Mitotic Centrosome Proteins and Complexes , and Recruitment of Numa to Mitotic Centrosomes ) with significant overlaps (pointed out by Pita‐Juarez et al, ) and the strong correlations due to shared genes were substantially reduced by the adjusted measure (based on TCGA ovarian cancer data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let G S i and G S j denote two pathways, and then the genes in GSiGSj can be partitioned into three nonoverlapped sets, namely, GSiGSj (shared genes), G S i \ G S j (genes in G S i only), and G S j \ G S i (genes in G S j only), and then the following measure can be used to adjust the effect of GSiGSj PCoradj(GSi,GSj)=PCor(GSi,GSj\GSi)+PCor(GSj,GSi\GSj)2. In general, by the adjustment above, the pathways with significant amount of shared genes (e.g., DNA Replication pathway and Cell Cycle pathway) will be assigned with a much weaker correlation, which removes the bias due to redundant annotations. Figure shows an example of three pathways ( Cell Cycle Mitotic , Recruitment of Mitotic Centrosome Proteins and Complexes , and Recruitment of Numa to Mitotic Centrosomes ) with significant overlaps (pointed out by Pita‐Juarez et al, ) and the strong correlations due to shared genes were substantially reduced by the adjusted measure (based on TCGA ovarian cancer data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we chose to use a recently developed projection correlation as the measure because of its advantages over other multivariate dependence measures. One practical issue in this step is the existence of shared genes between pathways, which should be adjusted when quantifying the pathway expression (Pita‐Juarez et al, ), especially when the amount of shared genes is significant. Without a proper adjustment for the shared genes, pathways that overlap with many others could be overrepresented in pathway ranking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a vast literature on the non-trivial problem of analysing patterns of enrichment and cooccurrence of pathways using bulk expression profiles [51][52][53]. Exploiting heterogeneity among single-cells with UniPath can easily leverage such analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a variety of indices (e.g., Jaccard, Sørensen-Dice, Tversky) have been used to assess the similarity between sets, the Szymkiewicz-Simpson coefficient (Equation 1) is most appropriate for comparing sets widely varying in size. Similarly to previous studies, we have chosen this index to not only calculate pathway similarity but also reveal contained pathways (i.e., when most of the nodes from a small pathway are in a larger pathway) to indicate potential hierarchical relationships (Chen et al, 2014, Pita-Juarez et al ., 2018Belinky et al ., 2015;Katiyar et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Estimating Pathway Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%