2011
DOI: 10.1142/s021830131101840x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Path to Improved Reaction Rates for Astrophysics

Abstract: This review focuses on nuclear reactions in astrophysics and, more specifically, on reactions with light ions (nucleons and α particles) proceeding via the strong interaction. It is intended to present the basic definitions essential for studies in nuclear astrophysics, to point out the differences between nuclear reactions taking place in stars and in a terrestrial laboratory, and to illustrate some of the challenges to be faced in theoretical and experimental studies of those reactions. The discussion revolv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
343
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
2
343
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a deficiency in the description of either the γ or the neutron transmission (or both) because σ (α,γ ) is proportional to T γ /T n at these energies. This ratio depends on the nuclear input used, such as the optical potential and discrete final states for T n and the gamma/strength function and level density for T γ [56,66].…”
Section: α-Induced Reactions At Sub-barrier Energies On 113 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a deficiency in the description of either the γ or the neutron transmission (or both) because σ (α,γ ) is proportional to T γ /T n at these energies. This ratio depends on the nuclear input used, such as the optical potential and discrete final states for T n and the gamma/strength function and level density for T γ [56,66].…”
Section: α-Induced Reactions At Sub-barrier Energies On 113 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of statistical model calculations for the cross sections obtained with the default settings of the Hauser-Feshbach codes NON-SMOKER [50,51], TALYS [52], and SMARAGD (version 0.9.3s) [53] are also included in the figures. Apart from differences in the internal numerics, the codes mainly differ in the input used to determine the transmission coefficients which are the central quantities in the Hauser-Fesbach approach [54,55]. Of special relevance here is the optical α+nucleus potential, as discussed in more detail below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the Hauser-Feshbach model are the averaged widths, computed from transmission coefficients which, in turn, are obtained from solutions of the Schrödinger equation using effective inter- action potentials or, for photon transmission coefficients, from the knowledge of photon strength functions and nuclear level densities [55]. For reactions in astrophysics, mostly averaged neutron-, proton-, α-, and γ widths have to be considered.…”
Section: B Comparison To Theory and Implications For The Stellar Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several, well-established HF code packages for cross section and reaction rate calculation available on the market including TALYS, NON-SMOKER, EM-PIRE [16], MOST [17] and SMARAGD [18]. In each case the code package requires a user to select between the various available options for nuclear input model.…”
Section: Statistical Model Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%