2008
DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.3.84a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The past, present, and future of prairie potholes in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since European settlement, these wetlands have been converted to cropland with wetland losses greatest in the eastern portion of the PPR. Concordantly, the PPR in Minnesota and Iowa have experienced the greatest wetland losses, 85% and 95% respectively, while North and South Dakota have retained many more wetlands, with losses of 49% and 35%, respectively (Dahl 1990;Johnson et al 2008). Losses of surrounding prairie habitats have been even greater than wetland losses (Beyersbergen et al 2004).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since European settlement, these wetlands have been converted to cropland with wetland losses greatest in the eastern portion of the PPR. Concordantly, the PPR in Minnesota and Iowa have experienced the greatest wetland losses, 85% and 95% respectively, while North and South Dakota have retained many more wetlands, with losses of 49% and 35%, respectively (Dahl 1990;Johnson et al 2008). Losses of surrounding prairie habitats have been even greater than wetland losses (Beyersbergen et al 2004).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Approximately half of the natural wetland basins in the PPR were drained many decades ago for agricultural and urban uses (Tiner 1984; Dahl 2000, 2006, 2011). The proportion of wetlands drained follows the moisture (and hence cropland productivity) gradient; nearly all prairie wetlands in the subhumid climate of Iowa and western Minnesota have been drained, while at present the majority remain intact in the drier, central Dakotas and in the western Canadian Prairies (Johnson et al 2008), although drainage has continued in both areas (Environment Canada 1991; Dahl and Watmough 2007; Bartzen et al 2010; Oslund et al 2010). Furthermore, the ecological functions of many remaining wetlands have been impacted by invasive species, habitat conversion, overgrazing, and by farming in dry years (Gleason and Euliss 1998; Guntenspergen et al 2002; Gleason et al 2003; van der Valk 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confidence intervals were based on random draws using the sample size of the comparison study b As our study did not extend into Montana, our comparison is with nearby North Dakota Missouri Coteau wetlands however, suggest increases in annual precipitation that are in agreement with our wettest model (CSIRO), with the greatest increases occurring in spring when newly tilled landscapes are susceptible to erosion. The ability of prairie pothole wetlands to support vertebrate communities is influenced by land use modification, changing agricultural practices, pothole drainage systems, and climate change, which collectively result in altered patterns of wetland inundation (Johnson et al 2005;Johnson et al 2008;Oslund et al 2010;Anteau 2012). Functionality will be lost by the sizeable percentage of wetlands likely to lose at least half of their volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%