2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The particle phase state during the biomass burning events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeRieux et al (2018) predicted the viscosity of biomass-burning particles using their chemical composition and found that their viscosity varied between 10 −2 and 10 9 Pa s, depending on the RH. Liu et al (2021) found that ambient and lab-generated biomass-burning particles are in a nonsolid state at RHs of between 20 % and 50 %. Li et al (2020) predicted the viscosity of ambient biomassburning organic aerosols from the volatility distribution and found that it varies from 10 −2 Pa s (liquid state) to above 10 12 Pa s (solid state) in Athens (Greece) and from 10 −2 Pa s (liquid state) to ∼ 10 9 Pa s in Mexico City (Mexico).…”
Section: Phase States Of Particles At the Omp Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeRieux et al (2018) predicted the viscosity of biomass-burning particles using their chemical composition and found that their viscosity varied between 10 −2 and 10 9 Pa s, depending on the RH. Liu et al (2021) found that ambient and lab-generated biomass-burning particles are in a nonsolid state at RHs of between 20 % and 50 %. Li et al (2020) predicted the viscosity of ambient biomassburning organic aerosols from the volatility distribution and found that it varies from 10 −2 Pa s (liquid state) to above 10 12 Pa s (solid state) in Athens (Greece) and from 10 −2 Pa s (liquid state) to ∼ 10 9 Pa s in Mexico City (Mexico).…”
Section: Phase States Of Particles At the Omp Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation (i.e., dominance of liquid-like particles in biomass burning) was similarly observed by Liu et al (not strictly related to wildre burning events), where they also establish that numerous chamber-related studies have underestimated the liquid character of true, ambient biomass burning particles. 27…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Therefore, given the importance of aerosol particle physical properties, many research efforts have targeted a further understanding of the interplay between aerosol size, phase state, and chemical composition [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] with some specically focusing on the chemical composition of size-resolved biomass burning (including wildres). [22][23][24][25][26][27] As examples, size-dependent aerosol mixing states have been observed from biomass burning events in China, 25,26 and brown carbon was found to have a size-dependence in wildre specic plumes in Northeast Canada. 23 Size-resolved secondary organic aerosol (SOA) composition and evolution in wildre aerosols remains as a signicant knowledge gap though, particularly with respect to how molecular level information inuences particle physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,25,26 The Aerosol Inorganic−Organic Mixtures Functional groups Activity Coefficients Viscosity (AIOMFAC-VISC) model was used to calculate the viscosity of particles by which the particle phase state can be further determined. 27 As a unique online method, particle rebound measurements 28 are conducted to identify the phase state of atmospheric particles in forests, 10 rural areas, 29 and polluted megacities. 12 Although these aforementioned methods were proposed, currently, the global particle phase state has not been widely discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic viscosity of laboratory-generated particles was quantified using a series of offline measurement techniques, such as bead-mobility technique, poke-and-flow technique, and measurement using optical tweezers. , These methods were used to detect the viscosity of field particles. , Based on the laboratory measurements, several semiempirical methods have also been developed to estimate the glass-transition temperature ( T g ), and the particle phase state was determined by comparing T g with ambient temperature. ,, The Aerosol Inorganic–Organic Mixtures Functional groups Activity Coefficients Viscosity (AIOMFAC-VISC) model was used to calculate the viscosity of particles by which the particle phase state can be further determined . As a unique online method, particle rebound measurements are conducted to identify the phase state of atmospheric particles in forests, rural areas, and polluted megacities . Although these aforementioned methods were proposed, currently, the global particle phase state has not been widely discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%