1987
DOI: 10.2307/1167316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Participation of Women and Minorities in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technical Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed researchers have explored how institutional environments, policies, and practices infl uence success among URMs in STEM fi elds (Chipman and Thomas, 1987;Herzig, 2004;Nixon, Meikle, and Borman, 2007 (Nixon, Meikle, and Borman, 2007). However, we still have much to learn about how institutional environments enable success among URMs in the STEM fi elds.…”
Section: Institutional Disparities In Stem Student Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed researchers have explored how institutional environments, policies, and practices infl uence success among URMs in STEM fi elds (Chipman and Thomas, 1987;Herzig, 2004;Nixon, Meikle, and Borman, 2007 (Nixon, Meikle, and Borman, 2007). However, we still have much to learn about how institutional environments enable success among URMs in the STEM fi elds.…”
Section: Institutional Disparities In Stem Student Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although analysts and researchers have acknowledged the importance of one or more of these dimensions, and a few have considered relationships among them (e.g., Berryman, 1983;Chipman & Thomas, 1984;Peterson & Fennema, 1985), little theoretical or empirical work has investigated how these factors work together, attempted to disentangle the relative contribution of each of these influences on participation, or established causal links among them. Because of these gaps in the literature, serious questions remain about what roles schooling opportunities play in achievement, why different groups of students achieve at different levels, or why some groups tend not to choose to take advantage of the schooling opportunities they have available to them.…”
Section: College Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speculation about the relevance of these factors arises from work suggesting that individuals pursue areas that they value and in which they expect success (see, e.g., Chipman & Thomas, 1984). Other support for the potential importance of affective factors comes from the types of analyses described earlier suggesting that a primary reason that women are underrepresented in science is that they choose not to pursue study and careers in cognitive fields.…”
Section: Gender and Cognitive Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to girls, boys were also shown to perceive mathematics as more useful to them in the future (Thorndike-Christ, 1991). Consequently, relatively large gender differences in favor of males are noted with respect to participation in elective mathematics courses and choice of mathematics-based professions (Chipman & Thomas, 1987;Eccles, 1985Eccles, , 1987Leder, 1992;Title, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%