1994
DOI: 10.2307/749291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Participation, Beliefs, and Development of Arithmetic Meaning of a Third-Grade Student in Mathematics Class Discussions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematics education researchers have begun to examine links between students' beliefs and classroom norms and practices (e.g., Bowers & Nickerson, 2001;Cobb et al, 2001;Lo, Wheatley, & Smith, 1994;Stephan, Cobb, & Gravemeijer, 2003); these studies primarily emphasized the analysis of classroom norms and mathematical practices in single classrooms, complemented by analyses of students' beliefs that focus on case studies of small JANSEN numbers of students. In this study, I coordinated analyses of students' beliefs with the analysis of social interactions by shifting the emphasis onto individual students and analyzed a larger number of cases (N = 15) of students' participation and beliefs, with complementary analyses of typical patterns of interaction during whole-class discussions in two classrooms.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematics education researchers have begun to examine links between students' beliefs and classroom norms and practices (e.g., Bowers & Nickerson, 2001;Cobb et al, 2001;Lo, Wheatley, & Smith, 1994;Stephan, Cobb, & Gravemeijer, 2003); these studies primarily emphasized the analysis of classroom norms and mathematical practices in single classrooms, complemented by analyses of students' beliefs that focus on case studies of small JANSEN numbers of students. In this study, I coordinated analyses of students' beliefs with the analysis of social interactions by shifting the emphasis onto individual students and analyzed a larger number of cases (N = 15) of students' participation and beliefs, with complementary analyses of typical patterns of interaction during whole-class discussions in two classrooms.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, conceptual supports can be useful in enabling children to carry out and communicate solution methods, but teachers must also use them in class activities that are structured to help children learn knowledge that is required for more advanced methods. Without such activities, children may continue to use unitary methods of counting all of the ones, even in third or fourth grade and even in projects focused on meaning-making (Cobb, 1995;Drueck, 1997;Lo, Wheatley, & Smith, 1994;Steinberg, Carpenter, & Fennema, 1994).…”
Section: Relationships Among Solution Methods Quantity Conceptual Sumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cobb, Wood, & Yackel, 1993;Cobb & Bauersfeld, 1996) did use models of tens and ones (often unifix cubes stored in columns of ten), but few teachers seem to have used systematic activities with such models to facilitate all children's construction of generative tens conceptual structures. Some children in third grade (Lo, Wheatley, & Smith, 1994) and in the fourth grade (Steinberg, Carpenter, & Fennema, 1994) were still using unitary methods. In our experience, all second graders, even those coming from backgrounds of urban poverty, can come to carry out and explain generalisable addition and subtraction methods involving tens by several months into the school year if they have experiences to help them construct the conceptual prerequisites for such methods (Fuson, 1996;Fuson & Smith, 1995;.…”
Section: Issues Concerning Moving To Personally Meaningful Numerical mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These calls for more meaningful discourse in mathematics classrooms are grounded in research demonstrating the social nature of learning mathematics (Cobb, Boufi, McClain, & Whitenack, 1997) and a vision of school mathematical practice that reflects the essence of mathematical practice within the discipline (Lampert, 1990). It is through participation in A SITUATIVE VIEW OF TEACHING MATH classroom discourse that students become initiated into the community of mathematical practice (Lo, Wheatley, & Smith, 1994). Mathematical discourse in the classroom provides an arena in which the students learn how to represent mathematics through thinking, talking, agreeing, and disagreeing about mathematics, rather than learning from the talk (Lave & Wenger, 1991).…”
Section: Mathematics-specific Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 98%