Abstract:The divergence-free and gamma-traceless vector-spinor eigenfunctions, as well as the divergence-free and gamma-traceless rank-2 symmetric tensor-spinor eigenfunctions, of the Dirac operator on the N -sphere (S N ) are written down explicitly for N ≥ 3. The spin-3/2 and spin-5/2 eigenmodes of the Dirac operator with arbitrary imaginary mass parameter on N -dimensional (N ≥ 3) de Sitter spacetime (dS N ) are obtained by analytic continuation. Their transformation properties under the de Sitter algebra spin(N, 1)… Show more
“…On the other hand, the massless spin− 3 2 field is the gravitino field, known to be a fermionic gauge field in supersymmetry literature. From this perspective the results of [35] supported by representation theory of the de Sitter group, connect supersymmetry with four spacetime dimensions in the presence of the cosmological constant. We leave it to future studies to extend our list of late-time operators to include cases of nonzero spin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following [13], in four dimensions the exceptional series category is considered equivalent to a discrete series category and we recognize α M N and β M N to belong to discrete series representations, which also agrees with [32]. Other examples in this category are the nonzero spin fields in Higher Spin theory on de Sitter [34] and the spin− 3 2 and 5 2 fermions [35]. Another example of identifying discrete series representations comes from modified gravity literature [36], where the tensor degrees f freedom at a perturbative level are recognized to belong to discrete series representations of the de Sitter group.…”
Section: Massless Scalar and The Discrete Series Representationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our discussion of late-time operators, we paid particular attention to their normalization. Normalization of states that can arise from fields on de Sitter have also been a guiding property in obtaining ranges of masses for gauge fields [88] or dimensionality for fermions [35]. Reference [88] studies allowed mass ranges for scalar, vector and spin two fields on de Sitter by considering equal-time commutations in Poincaré patch and analysing the norm of the states these fields give rise to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, for the mass M in terms of the value of the cosmological constant Λ, the range 0 < M 2 < 2 3 Λ is forbidden for spin−2 as it gives rise to negative norm states. Reference [35] analysis covers spin− 3 2 and spin− 5 2 in terms of the unitary irreducible representations of Spin(d + 1, 1), and the double cover of de Sitter group in general dimensions using analytic continuation methods from the sphere to de Sitter. To be more precise, it is the strictly massless spin− 3 2 , strictly and partially massless spin− 5 2 fields that are studied.…”
The de Sitter spacetime is a maximally symmetric spacetime. It is one of the vacuum solutions to Einstein equations with a cosmological constant. It is the solution with a positive cosmological constant and describes a universe undergoing accelerated expansion. Among the possible signs for a cosmological constant, this solution is relevant for primordial and late-time cosmology. In the case of a zero cosmological constant, studies on the representations of its isometry group have led to a broader understanding of particle physics. The isometry group of d+1-dimensional de Sitter is the group SO(d+1,1), whose representations are well known. Given this insight, what can we learn about the elementary degrees of freedom in a four dimensional de Sitter universe by exploring how the unitary irreducible representations of SO(4,1) present themselves in cosmological setups? This article aims to summarize recent advances along this line that benefit towards a broader understanding of quantum field theory and holography at different signs of the cosmological constant. Particular focus is given to the manifestation of SO(4,1) representations at the late-time boundary of de Sitter. The discussion is concluded by pointing towards future questions at the late-time boundary and the static patch with a focus on the representations.
“…On the other hand, the massless spin− 3 2 field is the gravitino field, known to be a fermionic gauge field in supersymmetry literature. From this perspective the results of [35] supported by representation theory of the de Sitter group, connect supersymmetry with four spacetime dimensions in the presence of the cosmological constant. We leave it to future studies to extend our list of late-time operators to include cases of nonzero spin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following [13], in four dimensions the exceptional series category is considered equivalent to a discrete series category and we recognize α M N and β M N to belong to discrete series representations, which also agrees with [32]. Other examples in this category are the nonzero spin fields in Higher Spin theory on de Sitter [34] and the spin− 3 2 and 5 2 fermions [35]. Another example of identifying discrete series representations comes from modified gravity literature [36], where the tensor degrees f freedom at a perturbative level are recognized to belong to discrete series representations of the de Sitter group.…”
Section: Massless Scalar and The Discrete Series Representationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our discussion of late-time operators, we paid particular attention to their normalization. Normalization of states that can arise from fields on de Sitter have also been a guiding property in obtaining ranges of masses for gauge fields [88] or dimensionality for fermions [35]. Reference [88] studies allowed mass ranges for scalar, vector and spin two fields on de Sitter by considering equal-time commutations in Poincaré patch and analysing the norm of the states these fields give rise to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, for the mass M in terms of the value of the cosmological constant Λ, the range 0 < M 2 < 2 3 Λ is forbidden for spin−2 as it gives rise to negative norm states. Reference [35] analysis covers spin− 3 2 and spin− 5 2 in terms of the unitary irreducible representations of Spin(d + 1, 1), and the double cover of de Sitter group in general dimensions using analytic continuation methods from the sphere to de Sitter. To be more precise, it is the strictly massless spin− 3 2 , strictly and partially massless spin− 5 2 fields that are studied.…”
The de Sitter spacetime is a maximally symmetric spacetime. It is one of the vacuum solutions to Einstein equations with a cosmological constant. It is the solution with a positive cosmological constant and describes a universe undergoing accelerated expansion. Among the possible signs for a cosmological constant, this solution is relevant for primordial and late-time cosmology. In the case of a zero cosmological constant, studies on the representations of its isometry group have led to a broader understanding of particle physics. The isometry group of d+1-dimensional de Sitter is the group SO(d+1,1), whose representations are well known. Given this insight, what can we learn about the elementary degrees of freedom in a four dimensional de Sitter universe by exploring how the unitary irreducible representations of SO(4,1) present themselves in cosmological setups? This article aims to summarize recent advances along this line that benefit towards a broader understanding of quantum field theory and holography at different signs of the cosmological constant. Particular focus is given to the manifestation of SO(4,1) representations at the late-time boundary of de Sitter. The discussion is concluded by pointing towards future questions at the late-time boundary and the static patch with a focus on the representations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.