2008
DOI: 10.1177/009145090803500408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Parsis of India and the opium trade in China

Abstract: The article examines the role of the Parsis of India in the opium trade between China and India during the 18th and 19th centuries. It examines the significant role of a non-European group in the history of drugs. The Parsi involvement in the opium trade constituted an important component in the rise of Western capital in Asia, the development of the Indian and imperial economies, and the growth of Bombay and other colonial centers. Furthermore, the article examines the ability of drugs to serve the interests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jamsetjee Jeejeebhoy (1783-1859) is an example par excellence of the spaces in which traces of the opium trade mark the city-scape through the civic institutions like the hospitals, colleges, and libraries he endowed (Palsetia, 2005, 2008). Jeejeebhoy became a member of the Parsi Punchayet in 1823 and was considered by the British as one of the leaders of all native communities in Bombay after the 1830s.…”
Section: Time and Ocean Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamsetjee Jeejeebhoy (1783-1859) is an example par excellence of the spaces in which traces of the opium trade mark the city-scape through the civic institutions like the hospitals, colleges, and libraries he endowed (Palsetia, 2005, 2008). Jeejeebhoy became a member of the Parsi Punchayet in 1823 and was considered by the British as one of the leaders of all native communities in Bombay after the 1830s.…”
Section: Time and Ocean Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, no evaluation of all nuances of the Canton trade or of the involvement of other nationalities has been made, and there has been an excessive stress on the events leading to the first Opium War (Greenberg, 1951;Dermigny, 1964;Le Pichon, 1998). Some exceptions to this are the studies about US participation in Cantonese trade (Downs, 1968(Downs, , 1997, Parsi involvement in the opium trade (Palsetia, 2008) and some approaches to the Portuguese role (Guimarães, 1996).…”
Section: The Spanish Involvement and The Opium Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%