The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1983
DOI: 10.1093/sf/61.3.872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pareto Curve and Its Utility for Open-Ended Income Distributions in Survey Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results reported here and below also did not differ substantively when using the full sample and replacing top coded values with calculated values based on formulas for the mean of open-ended income categories derived from Pareto curve estimation (Parker and Fenwick 1983) or imputing a top-code value suggested by Autor, Katz, and Krueger (1997, p.A1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Results reported here and below also did not differ substantively when using the full sample and replacing top coded values with calculated values based on formulas for the mean of open-ended income categories derived from Pareto curve estimation (Parker and Fenwick 1983) or imputing a top-code value suggested by Autor, Katz, and Krueger (1997, p.A1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Respondents' earnings were initially measured in ten income categories, beginning with less than $10,000 and ending with an open-ended category of greater than $90,000. The nine closed categories were recoded to the midpoint, while the value of the open-ended upper category was estimated using the technique developed by Parker and Fenwick (1983). An additional work-related control variable was tenure, measured in years that the respondent has worked for his/her current employer.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create a continuous income measure, individuals were assigned the midpoints of their bracketed income. The top category was assigned a value of USD 122,189, derived from a two-category, median-based Pareto curve method [Parker and Fenwick, 1983]. In some cases, participants were categorized as 'over USD 20,000' and 'under USD 20,000'.…”
Section: Family Incomementioning
confidence: 99%