2015
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2015.1138572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradoxes of Word of Mouth in Electronic Commerce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the expectation-confirmation theory, one would expect the performance of the product/service before use, and if their expectations are confirmed, they tend to show positive attitudes towards these products/services. In this case, if the positive comments from others are received and confirmed by the potential buyers, they tend to be satisfied with these products/services [112].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the expectation-confirmation theory, one would expect the performance of the product/service before use, and if their expectations are confirmed, they tend to show positive attitudes towards these products/services. In this case, if the positive comments from others are received and confirmed by the potential buyers, they tend to be satisfied with these products/services [112].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both effects are intertwined, so the direct impacts of satisfaction on financial performance are difficult to predict accurately. Lin and Heng [86] proposed the "WOM valence paradox," which argues that positive eWOM valence for a firm drives sales growth as well as heightens consumer expectations. As business growth increases, the company is unable to cope, leading to unmet consumer expectations and negative WOM and decreased sales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is a point at which the performance obtained is significantly different from the OCRs, so the stimulus is located outside the zone of tolerance. In this case, individuals feel that their initial perceived positivity was misplaced and develop postconsumption responses which are inconsistent with their initial perception, the perceived positivity exerting a contrasting effect (Bridges, 1993;Lin & Heng, 2015;Yi & La, 2003).…”
Section: How Does the Positive Valence Intensity Of Ocrs Influence Inmentioning
confidence: 99%