2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2465379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradox of Judicial Foreclosure: Collateral Value Uncertainty and Mortgage Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second strand of articles reaches a contrary conclusion. Harrison and Seiler's (2015) sample of almost 27,000 rate quotes presents findings at odds with Meador, Schill, Curtis, and Pence. Controlling for local economic conditions and, in some models, focusing on cities on either side of a judicial/non-judicial border, Harrison and Seiler find that-whereas borrower protections such as a statutory right of redemption, anti-deficiency-judgment laws, and a lengthy foreclosure process are associated with higher rate quotes-rate quotes are lower in states that require judicial foreclosure.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A second strand of articles reaches a contrary conclusion. Harrison and Seiler's (2015) sample of almost 27,000 rate quotes presents findings at odds with Meador, Schill, Curtis, and Pence. Controlling for local economic conditions and, in some models, focusing on cities on either side of a judicial/non-judicial border, Harrison and Seiler find that-whereas borrower protections such as a statutory right of redemption, anti-deficiency-judgment laws, and a lengthy foreclosure process are associated with higher rate quotes-rate quotes are lower in states that require judicial foreclosure.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because there is little additional recourse available to a lender post-default for each additional month in which the borrower does not make payments, the borrower may continue to live in the house while withholding additional mortgage payments with few associated marginal costs. By contrast, longer procedural periods in judicial-foreclosure states impose costs on lenders, who must maintain the property and pay property taxesor be faced a dilapidated property with tax liens post-foreclosure (Harrison & Seiler, 2015). By one estimate, foreclosures cost an average of $3,112 in judicial-foreclosure states but only $2,269 in other states (Demiroglu, et al 2014).…”
Section: Foreclosures On the Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Lee, Mayer and Tracy , Agarwal et al. ) or when the property is located in a judicial foreclosure state where the time to proceed through a foreclosure can be extremely lengthy (Ghent and Kudlyak , Harrison and Seiler )…”
Section: Morality Debates Relating To Mortgage Defaultmentioning
confidence: 99%