“…A second strand of articles reaches a contrary conclusion. Harrison and Seiler's (2015) sample of almost 27,000 rate quotes presents findings at odds with Meador, Schill, Curtis, and Pence. Controlling for local economic conditions and, in some models, focusing on cities on either side of a judicial/non-judicial border, Harrison and Seiler find that-whereas borrower protections such as a statutory right of redemption, anti-deficiency-judgment laws, and a lengthy foreclosure process are associated with higher rate quotes-rate quotes are lower in states that require judicial foreclosure.…”