2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.aat9314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of irrigation efficiency

Abstract: Higher efficiency rarely reduces water consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
329
1
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
329
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the SD-6 LEMA has unique elements hypothesized to promote self-organization (Ostrom 2009), the generalizability remains to be tested on larger scales, such as the recently approved LEMA over most of the GMD that includes SD-6. Increases in irrigation efficiency are often ineffective at reducing overall water consumption, but enforceable accounting, extraction limits, and improved understanding of irrigator behavior can help ensure efficiency improvements translate into water conservation (Grafton et al 2018). In systems more dissimilar from Kansas or lacking strong local leaders and local accountability as in the SD-6 region, programs like the LEMA may be difficult to implement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the SD-6 LEMA has unique elements hypothesized to promote self-organization (Ostrom 2009), the generalizability remains to be tested on larger scales, such as the recently approved LEMA over most of the GMD that includes SD-6. Increases in irrigation efficiency are often ineffective at reducing overall water consumption, but enforceable accounting, extraction limits, and improved understanding of irrigator behavior can help ensure efficiency improvements translate into water conservation (Grafton et al 2018). In systems more dissimilar from Kansas or lacking strong local leaders and local accountability as in the SD-6 region, programs like the LEMA may be difficult to implement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop choice could be a flexible strategy to manage the 5 year water allocation cycle of the LEMA program. Basso et al (2013) suggested that there is opportunity across the aquifer to improve sustainability by choosing crops with water requirements that match local availability; combined with strict water restrictions and oversight, these changes have a larger probability of translating into reduced water consumption (Grafton et al 2018).…”
Section: Changes In Crop Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water accounting is based on ET because the water supply is fully allocated, and downstream surface, groundwater supplies, and water rights are dependent on historic return flows (deep percolation and/or field runoff) from upstream users. In watersheds where return flows are effectively reused within the watershed, water consumption determines the loss of water to the watershed (Clemmens et al, 2008; Grafton et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigated agriculture has a dual impact on freshwater resources through its consumption and potential qualitative degradation. It constitutes 70% of global water withdrawals and 45% of total food provision, while only about 20% of the world's cropland is irrigated (Grafton et al ., ). This disproportionate share is due to the capability of irrigated land to increase yield through maximizing crop evapotranspiration, hence productivity, and to produce two, sometimes three crops a year.…”
Section: The Continuous (And Worrying) Environmental Degradation Requmentioning
confidence: 97%