The Paradox of Democracy

Gershberg, Zac; Illing, Sean

doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226818900.001.0001

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A result has been increasing polarization which has led to the creation of communication channels that largely communicate to each constituency is insolation. In 2022 the national media shaped the discourse around the debate while in 1922 it was the local media that played the more significant role (Gershberg & Illing, 2022).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution to Critical Race Theory: Kentucky Legislative Curriculum Bans in 1922 and 2022

Brake

2023

Educational Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article draws from primary and secondary historical sources such as public policy documents, speeches, and media reports to trace attempts made by the Kentucky legislature to ban controversial topics in public school curriculum—evolution in 1922 and critical race theory in 2022. Kingdon’s multiple streams framework (MSF) serves as the model for this historical and contemporary comparative education policy analysis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution to Critical Race Theory: Kentucky Legislative Curriculum Bans in 1922 and 2022

Brake

2023

Educational Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Echoing the debate between Lipmann and Dewey, is the complexity of society too much as Lipmann noted, or can we rely on Dewey's faith in social interaction to steer this development? Following Dewey, can the ordinary, reasonably informed individual, (the hypothetical rider on the Clapham omnibus) winnow out the truth from the noise associated with artificial intelligence (Gershberg and Illing, 2022)? Time will tell.…”

Section: So Whatmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nascent, Liminal, and Emerging Technologies

Ling

2023

Emerging Media

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, I consider how innovations emerge. I first look into what constitutes an innovation by asking about who benefits from the innovation and how it changes the institutional structure of society. I then trace the process of emergence as innovation moves through a liminal stage where different social groups work to interpret and perhaps contain the trajectory of the innovation. The discussion is illustrated by considering the path of different technologies such as printing, steam, digitalization, and artificial intelligence.

show abstract

Interactive Storytelling and the Paradox of Democracy

Sack

2022

Interactive Storytelling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Paradox of Democracy

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Evolution to Critical Race Theory: Kentucky Legislative Curriculum Bans in 1922 and 2022

Evolution to Critical Race Theory: Kentucky Legislative Curriculum Bans in 1922 and 2022

Nascent, Liminal, and Emerging Technologies

Interactive Storytelling and the Paradox of Democracy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About