2019
DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2019.1699432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradox of Authoritarian Power: Bureaucratic Games and Information Asymmetry. The Case of Nazarbayev’s Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to this, in the context of conducting research among public officials in Central Asia is the question of trust and personal contacts. Tutumlu and Rustemov (2021) report on a project studying bureaucratic behaviour in Kazakhstan, which involved interviewing public officials and managers to obtain revelations of particular political behaviour based on the premises of complete confidentiality:Officials in Kazakhstan deny the significance of problems brought to light by the public and blame specific people if a public claim gains traction. They also fix statistics, reports, and data interpretations.…”
Section: Central Asian Ethical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Related to this, in the context of conducting research among public officials in Central Asia is the question of trust and personal contacts. Tutumlu and Rustemov (2021) report on a project studying bureaucratic behaviour in Kazakhstan, which involved interviewing public officials and managers to obtain revelations of particular political behaviour based on the premises of complete confidentiality:Officials in Kazakhstan deny the significance of problems brought to light by the public and blame specific people if a public claim gains traction. They also fix statistics, reports, and data interpretations.…”
Section: Central Asian Ethical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….] by developing thriving personality cults, bureaucrats free themselves from public accountability and/or personal responsibility for the reforms and continue with their subversive patronal practices (Tutumlu and Rustemov, 2021: 8).…”
Section: Central Asian Ethical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%