2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paleoproterozoic fossil record: Implications for the evolution of the biosphere during Earth's middle-age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 241 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of timing during Earth history, it is generally agreed that the first forms of life on Earth were prokaryotes, with isotopic evidence for the existence of bacterial and archaeal metabolic processes tracing back to rocks 3.5 billion years of age [10,11] or older [12]. The microfossil record indicates that eukaryotes arose later, about 1.4 to 1.6 billion years ago [13], hence that eukaryotes arose from prokaryotes. Though eukaryotes are younger than prokaryotes, the nature of their phylogenetic relationship(s) to bacteria and archaea remains debated because of differing views about the evolutionary origin of eukaryotic cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of timing during Earth history, it is generally agreed that the first forms of life on Earth were prokaryotes, with isotopic evidence for the existence of bacterial and archaeal metabolic processes tracing back to rocks 3.5 billion years of age [10,11] or older [12]. The microfossil record indicates that eukaryotes arose later, about 1.4 to 1.6 billion years ago [13], hence that eukaryotes arose from prokaryotes. Though eukaryotes are younger than prokaryotes, the nature of their phylogenetic relationship(s) to bacteria and archaea remains debated because of differing views about the evolutionary origin of eukaryotic cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current molecular clock estimates for the emergence of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) vary considerably depending on the models and fossil calibrations used, ranging from 1.9 to 1 billion years ago (Ga) [39]. Putative crown-group eukaryotic microfossils date back to the late Paleoproterozoic Era (2.5-1.6 Ga) [40,41], consistent with the older age estimate for the LECA provided by molecular clocks [39]. Recently, phosphatized microfossils from the Vindhyan Supergroup in India have been interpreted as ca.…”
Section: Animal Origins In Context: the Tonian Earth Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors emphasized that linking fossils that are hundreds of millions to >1 billion years of age with modern representatives can be difficult, and also noted the potential for deposit contamination and for physical processes to mimic simple cyanobacterial morphologies. The difficulties of classifying Proterozoic remains as algae or even distinguishing prokaryotic fossils from eukaryotes were echoed by Javaux and Lepot (), who reviewed known Paleoproterozoic microfossils and provide an excellent primer on modern methods employed to evaluate such ancient remains.…”
Section: How Might More Proterozoic Fossils Aid Our Understanding Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common assumption that fossil akinetes indicate N‐fixation is based upon the potential for modern multicellular cyanobacteria that generate akinetes to also have the genetic capacity to produce structurally distinctive heterocytes (heterocysts) marking N‐fixation, but which may have lower preservation potential. Existing Proterozoic fossils interpreted as cyanobacterial akinetes have recently been reviewed (Javaux and Lepot ), but more fossil evidence would be helpful, because considerable skepticism surrounds the interpretation of putative akinete fossils. Benthic cyanobacterial filaments having cells interpreted as akinetes have recently been reported as compression fossils on the bedding surfaces of shales from the ~1,000–720 Ma Liulaobei Formation, North China (Pang et al.…”
Section: How Might More Proterozoic Fossils Aid Our Understanding Of mentioning
confidence: 99%