1954
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1954.tb07786.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The palatability of the eggs of birds: mainly based upon observations of an Egg Panel

Abstract: The paper contains the results of an investigation of the relative palatability of the eggs of 212 species of birds, belonging to twenty‐five orders, as determined by members of an Egg Panel, Low Temperature Research Station, Cambridge, during the years 1946 to 1951. The method of assessment has been generally similar to that hitherto used in the routine examination of fowls' eggs. Each sample, identified by a number but not named, and tested in the form of a scramble, is awarded a numerical score for general … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If greenish eggs are unpalatable they should be avoided over palatable eggs when these are abundant, unpalatable prey may be consumed when the predator is hungry (Dumbacher & Pruett-Jones, 1996). This possibility remains untested, but it is in agreement with the hypothesis that the conspicuousness of eggs may be negatively correlated with their palatability, as Cott suggested after studying the preferences of cats, ferrets, mongooses, hedgehogs, rats and humans, used as tasters (Cott, 1954 and papers cited therein). Conversely, we found that the rate of artificial nest predation by visual searching gulls was higher for eggs more conspicuous to the human eye that for eggs apparently resembling the nest substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If greenish eggs are unpalatable they should be avoided over palatable eggs when these are abundant, unpalatable prey may be consumed when the predator is hungry (Dumbacher & Pruett-Jones, 1996). This possibility remains untested, but it is in agreement with the hypothesis that the conspicuousness of eggs may be negatively correlated with their palatability, as Cott suggested after studying the preferences of cats, ferrets, mongooses, hedgehogs, rats and humans, used as tasters (Cott, 1954 and papers cited therein). Conversely, we found that the rate of artificial nest predation by visual searching gulls was higher for eggs more conspicuous to the human eye that for eggs apparently resembling the nest substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other egg traits may also be important determinants of survival from predation. For example, odour or palatability of eggs (Cott, 1948(Cott, , 1954) may offer contrasting advantages against avian vs. mammalian predators due to differences in the sensorial capabilities of these hunters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent reviews on bird toxicity do not include unpalatable or malodorous birds in their classification of poisonous birds (Bartram and Boland, 2001;Mebs, 2002). There is, however, an extensive body of evidence on this subject, chiefly from experimental work carried out by Cott (Cott, 1945(Cott, , 1946(Cott, , 1948(Cott, , 1954Cott and Benson, 1970), and by surveying field and museum ornithologists (Weldon and Rappole, 1997).…”
Section: Unpalatable or Malodorous Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%