1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(98)00547-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The p + p → π+ + d reaction close to threshold at COSY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K þ þ ðÃpÞ has been performed by the HIRES Collaboration [1,2] using the proton beam of the cooler synchrotron COSY [3] and the magnetic spectrograph BIG KARL [4,5] at the Research Center Jülich. The aim of the experiment was to study the Ãp final state interaction (FSI) and to search for narrow strangeness S ¼ À1 resonances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K þ þ ðÃpÞ has been performed by the HIRES Collaboration [1,2] using the proton beam of the cooler synchrotron COSY [3] and the magnetic spectrograph BIG KARL [4,5] at the Research Center Jülich. The aim of the experiment was to study the Ãp final state interaction (FSI) and to search for narrow strangeness S ¼ À1 resonances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some results of the Geant4 simulation were clearly deficient and we have supplemented them with experimental data in the highest E c bin: for elastic scattering of protons on all targets the Geant4 simulation underestimated the cross sections for E p ≤ 15 MeV and these have been replaced with results obtained from the EXFOR database [http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/exfor00.htm]; the reaction p + p → 2 H+ π + was not represented in the simulation and was added for 300 < E p < 3000 MeV [ Ramaty and Lingenfelter , 1969] assuming an isotropic secondary distribution, which is valid near the reaction threshold [ Drochner et al , 1998], and the reaction p + 4 He → 2 H+ 3 He, also not represented, was added for 40 < E p < 400 MeV [ Selesnick and Mewaldt , 1996]. In the cases of secondary 6 Li, 7 Li, and 7 Be the Geant4 results led to total cross sections that were significantly lower than experimental data [ Moskalenko and Mashnik , 2003], but they were used without supplementation because differential cross section data were not available; it is likely that the missing secondaries would be at low enough energy (in the LAB frame) so as not to contribute to the radiation belt model.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] Some results of the Geant4 simulation were clearly deficient and we have supplemented them with experimental data in the highest E c bin: for elastic scattering of protons on all targets the Geant4 simulation underestimated the cross sections for E p 15 MeV and these have been replaced with results obtained from the EXFOR database [http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/exfor00.htm]; the reaction p + p ! 2 H+ p + was not represented in the simulation and was added for 300 < E p < 3000 MeV [Ramaty and Lingenfelter, 1969] assuming an isotropic secondary distribution, which is valid near the reaction threshold [Drochner et al, 1998], and the reaction p + 4 He ! 2 H+ 3 He, also not represented, was added for 40 < E p < 400 MeV [Selesnick and Mewaldt, 1996].…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEM collaboration studied isospin symmetry breaking by comparing neutral and charged pion production in pp → dπ + and np → dπ 0 [5] reactions, and pd → 3 Hπ + and pd → 3 Heπ 0 reactions [30]. For the latter reactions it was found that the angular distribution of the matrix elements consists of two parts.…”
Section: η-Meson Physics Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target area detectors are especially suited for the identification of delayed decays and TOF is thus a geometry detector. BIG KARL [5,6] is a focusing magnetic spectrograph of the 3Q2D-type. Particle tracks are measured in the focal plane area with packs od MWDC's followed by scintillator hodoscopes allowing for a time of flight path of 3.5 m. Additional detectors exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%