2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The oxygen abundance gradient in M81 and the robustness of abundance determinations in H ii regions

Abstract: We study the sensitivity of the methods available for abundance determinations in H ii regions to potential observational problems. We compare the dispersions they introduce around the oxygen and nitrogen abundance gradients when applied to five different sets of spectra of H ii regions in the galaxy M81. Our sample contains 116 H ii regions with galactocentric distances of 3 to 33 kpc, including 48 regions observed by us with the OSIRIS long-slit spectrograph at the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias telescope. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5.2 the O3N2 diagnostic calibrated by Pettini & Pagel (2004) stands out as the only one providing H II region abundances that are consistent with our stellar metallicities in M83, which are all but one above the solar value. In the similarly high metallicity ( (O) > 8.6) environment of the galaxy M81 we reach the same conclusion, analyzing the supergiant data from Kudritzki et al (2012) and the nebular emission fluxes from Patterson et al (2012) and Arellano-Córdova et al (2016). Keeping in mind the statistical nature of strong-line diagnostics (i.e.…”
Section: A Recommended Strong-line Method?supporting
confidence: 73%
“…5.2 the O3N2 diagnostic calibrated by Pettini & Pagel (2004) stands out as the only one providing H II region abundances that are consistent with our stellar metallicities in M83, which are all but one above the solar value. In the similarly high metallicity ( (O) > 8.6) environment of the galaxy M81 we reach the same conclusion, analyzing the supergiant data from Kudritzki et al (2012) and the nebular emission fluxes from Patterson et al (2012) and Arellano-Córdova et al (2016). Keeping in mind the statistical nature of strong-line diagnostics (i.e.…”
Section: A Recommended Strong-line Method?supporting
confidence: 73%
“…This scatter is generally smaller than the amplitude of the radial variation, which typically ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 dex over the radial range we observe. It has been previously shown that strong line methods systematically produce smaller scatter in their radial gradients than direct temperature methods (Arellano-Córdova et al 2016), but this very small systematic scatter with respect to the radial gradient is similar to what has been found using direct temperature methods to measure the metallicity in the Milky Way (Esteban & García-Rojas 2018). It is, however, much smaller than what has been found with direct temperature methods for three nearby galaxies by the CHAOS project (∼0.1 dex; Croxall et al 2015;Berg et al 2015;Croxall et al 2016) and in M33 (0.11 dex; Rosolowsky & Simon 2008).…”
Section: Subtle Evidence For Azimuthal Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 is NGC 3031 (M81), for which a flat outer gradient has been suggested, but this result relies on a very small sample of outlying H II regions (Patterson et al 2012;Stanghellini et al 2014). A more recent work by Arellano-Córdova et al (2016) does not find evidence for a flat gradient out to a galactocentric distance of 33 kpc (2.3 R 25 ). This seems to be consistent with the shallow overall abundance gradient, both in dex kpc −1 and normalized to the isophotal radius, which is possibly the consequence of galaxy interactions.…”
Section: Other Systemsmentioning
confidence: 95%