2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The oxidative potential of PM2.5 exposures from indoor and outdoor sources in rural China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean 24‐hour personal exposures to EC ranged from 3.2±1.6 μg m −3 among Ghanaian women cooking with charcoal to 10.3±6.8 μg m −3 among northern Chinese women cooking with biomass and heating with coal (Figure ). The weighted mean value for 24‐hour personal exposures to EC was 5.6±4.0 μg m −3 (n=6 studies), which is comparable to average yearly EC concentrations in urban Beijing (5.2±3.7 μg m −3 ), lower than in‐traffic exposures in New Delhi (14±6.3 μg m −3 ) and much higher than ambient levels in London (1.5 μg m −3 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean 24‐hour personal exposures to EC ranged from 3.2±1.6 μg m −3 among Ghanaian women cooking with charcoal to 10.3±6.8 μg m −3 among northern Chinese women cooking with biomass and heating with coal (Figure ). The weighted mean value for 24‐hour personal exposures to EC was 5.6±4.0 μg m −3 (n=6 studies), which is comparable to average yearly EC concentrations in urban Beijing (5.2±3.7 μg m −3 ), lower than in‐traffic exposures in New Delhi (14±6.3 μg m −3 ) and much higher than ambient levels in London (1.5 μg m −3 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with the Lijiang study, which found that the individual daily PM 2.5 exposure concentration when LPG and electric stoves were used was 91 μg/m 3 , but when biomass fuel was used, it was 119 μg/m 3 . Other studies have also found that using biomass fuel for cooking increased PM 2.5 concentrations and that the use of cleaner fuels like natural gas and electricity did less harm to human health …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The exposure concentration exposure concentration when LPG and electric stoves were used was 91 μg/m 3 , but when biomass fuel was used, it was 119 μg/ m 3 . Other studies [17][18][19]25,47 have also found that using biomass fuel for cooking increased PM 2.5 concentrations and that the use of cleaner fuels like natural gas and electricity did less harm to human health. 55 Figure 5 shows the rural PM 2.5 exposure levels of smokers, passive smokers, and people who were not exposed to tobacco smoke (also listed in Table S3).…”
Section: Daily Average Personal Pm 25 Exposure Levelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations