2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(03)00043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The overqualified Canadian graduate: the role of the academic program in the incidence, persistence, and economic returns to overqualification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
125
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
125
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence and earnings effects of educational mismatch are well documented in the economic literature and findings are quite consistent (Hartog, 2000, Leuven andOosterbeek, 2011). They notably show that, in a given job with a specific level of required education, over-(under-) educated workers earn more (less) than those who have just the required education for the job (Battu et al, 1999, Dolton 3 and Vignoles, 2000, Frenette, 2004, McGuinness, 2003, van der Meer, 2006. In contrast, the evidence regarding the impact of over-and under-education on firm productivity is mixed, indirect and subject to various potential biases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence and earnings effects of educational mismatch are well documented in the economic literature and findings are quite consistent (Hartog, 2000, Leuven andOosterbeek, 2011). They notably show that, in a given job with a specific level of required education, over-(under-) educated workers earn more (less) than those who have just the required education for the job (Battu et al, 1999, Dolton 3 and Vignoles, 2000, Frenette, 2004, McGuinness, 2003, van der Meer, 2006. In contrast, the evidence regarding the impact of over-and under-education on firm productivity is mixed, indirect and subject to various potential biases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other studies regarding the wage effects of educational mismatch also highlight that, in a given job with a specific level of required education, over-(under-) educated workers earn more (less) than those who have just the required education for the job (Battu et al, 1999, Dolton and Vignoles, 2000, Duncan and Hoffman, 1981, Groot, 1996, Groot and Maassen van den Brink, 2000, Sicherman, 1991, van der Meer, 2006. Although part of this premium (penalty) may be explained by workers' unobserved heterogeneity (Bauer, 2002, Chevalier, 2003, Dolton and Silles, 2008, Frenette, 2004, Lamo and Messina, 2010, McGuinness, 2003, McGuinness and Sloane, 2011, current evidence on the basis of human capital theory thus suggests that over-(under-) education increases (reduces) workers' productivity. 2 Another strand of the literature examines the impact of educational mismatch on job satisfaction and other correlates of workers' productivity (such as absenteeism, shirking, turnover or training).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Frenette (2004) examined the incidence, persistence and economic returns to overqualification among Canadian post-secondary graduates using panel data. He found that master's graduates are far more likely to be overqualified for their current job than others.…”
Section: The Literature On Overqualificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One approach involves the consideration of panel data sets in order to control for all unobserved individual fixed effects (Bauer, 2002;Frenette, 2004;Korpi and Tåhlin, 2009;Tsai, 2010). They find that the wage penalty associated with being overeducated falls dramatically and even disappears when it is estimated by fixed effects, suggesting that (part of) the effect of educational mismatch is caused by unobserved individual ability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%