1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58691-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ovarian response as a predictor for successful in vitro fertilization treatment after the age of 40 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that, women 40 years old with adequate follicular development may represent a subgroup of patients with higher chances of conception [6,18]. In one of the earlier studies reporting ART success rates in advanced age groups, Bopp et al [1] emphasized the negative effect of maternal age on GIFT and IVF outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that, women 40 years old with adequate follicular development may represent a subgroup of patients with higher chances of conception [6,18]. In one of the earlier studies reporting ART success rates in advanced age groups, Bopp et al [1] emphasized the negative effect of maternal age on GIFT and IVF outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, those reports did not provide direct information regarding the responsiveness of the ovaries to the exogenous Gn used in ovarian stimulation for ART. In fact, other studies proposed that the clinical response to Gn treatment would be a more direct way to assess ovarian reserve and a better predictor of fertility potential (Roest et al, 1996;Farhi et al, 1997;Peñar-rubia et al, 2000). Phelps et al(1998) found that the estradiol concentration measured on Day 4 of Gn therapy was highly predictive of successful ovulation induction and pregnancy outcome in GnRHa-rFSH cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether these indirect provocative tests are more informative of ovarian reserve than basal hormone remains controversial (Galtier-Dereure et al, 1996;Ravhon et al, 2000). Furthermore, neither basal hormonal measurements nor those dynamic tests are capable of providing direct manifestation concerning the responsiveness of the ovaries to the exogenous Gn used in ovarian stimulation for ART (Roest et al, 1996;Farhi et al, 1997;Peñarrubia et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be useful to investigate whether AMH or AFC could differentiate in the prognosis of women who are normally denied IVF treatment because of advanced age. Older patients with a normal response might still perform well in IVF, and AMH or AFC levels have the potential to detect such women (35). Biologically plausible ϩϩϩ ϩϩ/ϩϩϩ ϩϩ ϩϩ/ϩϩϩ ϩ Cross-sectional relation with age ( Fig.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%