2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ovarian response and embryo recovery rate in Boer goat does following different superovulation protocols, during the breeding season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
14
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The CL number observed in this study were lower than those reported in studies conducted in Angora (15.1), Saanen (29.3), Alpine (14.3) and Boer (21.3) goats in the non-breeding season (Tervit et al 1985;Menchaca et al 2007b;Lehloenya et al 2008). On the other hand, the CL number observed in this study were similar to those of (5.3 vs 4.0) previously reported for Angora goats by Tervit et al (1985) and Boer goats (Lehloenya and Greyling 2010). Lower CL proportion could be due to the breed, hormonal response of ovaries, climatic conditions and day light duration of the treatment period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The CL number observed in this study were lower than those reported in studies conducted in Angora (15.1), Saanen (29.3), Alpine (14.3) and Boer (21.3) goats in the non-breeding season (Tervit et al 1985;Menchaca et al 2007b;Lehloenya et al 2008). On the other hand, the CL number observed in this study were similar to those of (5.3 vs 4.0) previously reported for Angora goats by Tervit et al (1985) and Boer goats (Lehloenya and Greyling 2010). Lower CL proportion could be due to the breed, hormonal response of ovaries, climatic conditions and day light duration of the treatment period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The day 0 group had a significantly lower number of CLs, and this finding corresponds to the results obtained by a similar protocol in the study conducted by MENCHACA et al (2007) and LEHLOENYA and GREYLING (2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, all does used as donor are within their peak of reproduction owing to the acceptable mean number of transferrable embryos recovered following flushing, though lower compared to superovulation of dairy goats, Murciano-Granadina (14.7±2.5) and Jakhrana goats (11.8±2.9) (Gonzales-Bulnes et al, 2003;Goel et al, 2005). Moreover, the FSH dosage used in the induction of superovulation in Boer was 200 mg/doe (Lehloenya and Greyling, 2010), almost ten folds higher in this study which similarly had comparable results. These observations could be ascribed to the difference on the breed used, Boer being bigger and heavier by almost 5 folds to non-descript Philippines goats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, past studies with Boer goats involves the use of the long synchronization program (17 days) during and outside the natural breeding season without PGF2α treatment getting a mean ovulation rate of 16.5 ±0.8. But when the oestrous cycle was synchronized with controlled internal drug release dispenser (CIDR, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Auckland, New Zealand) for 7 days plus PGF 2 α (0.05 mg/doe) at the time of CIDR insertion, only mean ovulation rate of 4.0 ± 0.7 was obtained (Lehloenya and Greyling, 2010). In this study, the super-ovulation treatment started on the 16 th day of the cycle without intravaginal progestagen treatment and PGF 2 α was administered at a later hour (48 and 60) after the 1 st injection of gonadotropins resulting in a mean ovulation rate of 13.07 in 14 does, while 3 did not respond to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%