2001
DOI: 10.1177/014833310105100108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Outrageous Idea of a Christian Literary Studies: Prospects for the Future and a Meditation on Hope

Abstract: At the beginning of the second fifty years of this fine journal, perhaps it is timely to look both back and forward by way of suggesting possible directions for the future of our joint mission as scholars of Christianity and literature. It is indeed a daunting task: to scan the broad expanse of recent scholarship, assess the symptoms and drift of our profession, and then offer up, as my title presumptuously puts it, some prospects for the future. However, that is the assigned task at hand, and so it is with ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because religious freedom – overcoming the tyranny of non‐Protestant absolutist regimes – is the foundation of politics under secular liberalism, religion differs from other politics of identity – race, class, gender, and nationalism – that have been the focus of critiques of the Enlightenment. For these categories, we assume, as Harold Bush has argued, that the native informant has special knowledge, while for religion, we tend to assume the opposite. Being religious would tend to disqualify a critic – Charles Taylor being both the rule and the exception here – from scholarship on religion…”
Section: Introduction: the Secularization Thesis The Enlightenment mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because religious freedom – overcoming the tyranny of non‐Protestant absolutist regimes – is the foundation of politics under secular liberalism, religion differs from other politics of identity – race, class, gender, and nationalism – that have been the focus of critiques of the Enlightenment. For these categories, we assume, as Harold Bush has argued, that the native informant has special knowledge, while for religion, we tend to assume the opposite. Being religious would tend to disqualify a critic – Charles Taylor being both the rule and the exception here – from scholarship on religion…”
Section: Introduction: the Secularization Thesis The Enlightenment mentioning
confidence: 99%