The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure for osteoarthritis of the elbow: do site and number of loose bodies matter to the outcome?

Hussainy, Haydar A. J. Al; Hekal, Waleed; Farhan, M.J.

doi:10.1007/s00590-004-0209-3

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 1 , 2 Essential parts of non-operative treatment are rest, anti-inflammatory medication, and long-term activity modification. 1 Literature describes many different surgical procedures for elbow OA, both arthroscopic and open, including arthroscopic debridement with or without radial head resection, 4 – 20 open debridement, 6 , 21 – 23 interposition arthroplasty, 24 the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure, 25 – 29 radiocapitellar replacement, 30 and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). 31 The results of TEA and radiocapitellar arthroplasty as treatment modality for severe elbow OA have been reviewed recently.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the elbow can cause disabling symptoms of pain, locking, stiffness, and a limitation in the range of motion. There is no consensus regarding the role of open and arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of symptomatic primary elbow OA. The aim of this study is to systematically review the outcome of surgical debridement. A preoperative/postoperative comparison will be made between the two surgical procedures. All studies reporting on debridement as treatment for primary elbow OA with a minimum of one-year follow-up were included. Outcome parameters were functional results, complications, and performance scores. Data were extracted from 21 articles. The arthroscopic group consisted of 286 elbows with a weighted mean follow-up of 40 ± 17 months (range, 16–75). The open group consisted of 300 elbows with a weighted mean follow-up of 55 ± 20 months (range, 19–85). Both procedures showed improvement in Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM) flexion-extension, and ROM pronation-supination. Only in ROM flexion was a statistically significant difference in improvement seen between the groups in favour of the open group. The arthroscopic group showed improvement in pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Nothing could be stated about pain VAS scores in the open group due to a lack of data. In the arthroscopic group 18 complications (6%) were described, in the open group 29 complications (12%). Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:874-882. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This included functional outcome data for 274 elbows (122 arthroscopic and 152 open). 2,29,38,43,45,53,54 All studies reported significant improvement in MEPS following elbow debridement (Fig 2). Postoperative scores ranged from 88 to 90 in the arthroscopic group and 83 to 94 in the open group.…”

Section: Functional Outcome Scoresmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Fifteen different functional outcome scores were reported in 28 studies (67%); the various outcome scores used are displayed in Tables 3 and 4. 2,[13][14][15][20][21][22]26,27,[29][30][31][32][33]37,38,41,43,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][53][54][55] Two of these scores were physician-reported outcomes, 6 were patientreported outcomes, and 7 were a combination of physician and patient outcome measures. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was the most commonly used score in 19 studies.…”

Section: Functional Outcome Scoresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was the most commonly used score in 19 studies. 2,15,20,22,27,[29][30][31][32]37,38,41,43,45,46,49,51,53,54 Seven studies reported pre-and postoperative MEPS in a manner that could be used for comparison between the groups. This included functional outcome data for 274 elbows (122 arthroscopic and 152 open).…”

Section: Functional Outcome Scoresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven studies reported pre-and postoperative VAS in a manner that could be used for comparison between the groups. 2,21,26,29,31,37,41,45,46,50,54 VAS was reported using different scales by individual studies. Scores were hence standardized to a 1-10 scale using percentages to allow comparison between the groups.…”

Section: Pain Scoresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow

White

Ravi

Watson

et al. 2021

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The clinical impact of arthroscopic vs. open osteocapsular débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review

Guerrero

Bullock

Helmkamp

et al. 2020

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure for osteoarthritis of the elbow: do site and number of loose bodies matter to the outcome?

Cited by 3 publications

References 20 publications

Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow

The clinical impact of arthroscopic vs. open osteocapsular débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About