2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The outcome of protoplanetary dust growth: pebbles, boulders, or planetesimals?

Abstract: Context. The sticking of micron-sized dust particles caused by surface forces within circumstellar disks is the first stage in the production of asteroids and planets. The key components describing this process are the relative velocity between the dust particles in this environment and the complex physics of dust aggregate collisions. Aims. We present the results of a collision model based on laboratory experiments of these aggregates. We investigate the maximum aggregate size and mass that can be reached by … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
522
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
13
522
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first can be studied in the simulations that we present in this paper, while the actual masses and radii of planetesimal that form in the bound clumps will require the inclusion of particle shattering and particle sticking. Zsom & Dullemond (2008) and Zsom et al (2010) used a representative particle approach to model interaction between superparticles in a 0-D particle-inbox approach, based on a compilation of laboratory results for the outcome of collisions depending on particle sizes, composition and relative speed . We plan to implement this particle interaction scheme in the Pencil Code and perform simulations that include the concurrent action of hydrodynamical clumping and particle interaction.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first can be studied in the simulations that we present in this paper, while the actual masses and radii of planetesimal that form in the bound clumps will require the inclusion of particle shattering and particle sticking. Zsom & Dullemond (2008) and Zsom et al (2010) used a representative particle approach to model interaction between superparticles in a 0-D particle-inbox approach, based on a compilation of laboratory results for the outcome of collisions depending on particle sizes, composition and relative speed . We plan to implement this particle interaction scheme in the Pencil Code and perform simulations that include the concurrent action of hydrodynamical clumping and particle interaction.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of planetesimals due to dust coagulation is presently very uncertain due to several barriers to planetesimal growth: the bouncing barrier (Zsom et al 2010), the charge barrier (Okuzumi et al 2009), and the meter-size barrier (due to drift and fragmentation) (Blum & Wurm 2000). New approaches, such as formation in pressure maxima (Lyra et al 2009), particle concentration due to streaming instability and gravoturbulent planetesimal formation (Johansen et al 2014), have attempted to clarify these issues.…”
Section: Disk Dispersal In the Classic Core Accretion Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the Monte-Carlo simulation of the dust evolution in PPDs (adapted from Zsom et al (2010)). The underlying PPD model was a MMSN model at 1 AU and in the midplane with α = 10 −4 .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%