SUMMARY Despite the wealth of epidemiological material of the last decade, birth defects are still the chief cause of perinatal mortality and no significant breakthrough in understanding or reduction has yet been seen. Many proposed aetiological factors are still being evaluated. This report suggests a possible, simple, remediable factor in the aetiology of defects of the central nervous system.The chance remark of a patient some years ago prompted a retrospective case-sheet study of the mothers of anencephalics in a Merseyside hospital. Of 47 case sheets examined, only 23 gave specific information of uterine position in the non-pregnant state. Of these, 14 (61%) were retroverted and nine (39%) were anteverted. One case of anecdotal interest recorded the uterus as anteverted on two occasions and during this time the patient had had two normal babies. There were then five records of the uterus being retroverted, in the midst of which the patient had an anencephalic baby.It was recognised that a small retrospective case-sheet study was of limited value because of the inadequacy and lack of guarantee of reliability of the records. For this reason the following study was undertaken as part of a more comprehensive survey of defects of the central nervous system.
Material, methods, and resultsDuring a three-year survey, 113 cases of ASB births occurred in the hospitals of Izmir, a large city in western Turkey. Of the 77 cases who lived near enough to be recalled, 37 returned for discussion and examination. Most of the rest were lost because of change of address. Patients returning were questioned to complete information for the general survey, and examined and counselled with regard to further pregnancies. When possible, an independent vaginal examination was made by a colleague to assess uterine position. Of the 37 patients, 12 were already pregnant on recall. Of the remainder, 12 had an anteverted or mid-position uterus, 11 had a retroverted uterus, and two had acutely flexed and leave-rotated uteri. Including these two in the malposition group, there were 48% normal and 52% abnormally positioned uteri.A control group was made of 100 patients attending the routine gynaecological outpatient clinic. It is recognised that such a group may tend to give a slightly higher rate of retroversion than that in the normal population. Post-menopausal and pregnant patients and women with palpable tumours were excluded. Otherwise the group represented a typical gynaecological clinic cross-section. The obtained retroversion rate of 18% approximates to the generally accepted normal incidence of about 15% (Jeffcoate, 1967).
DiscussionNon-fixed retroversion is properly regarded in most gynaecological circles as a normal variant. However, the above study raises the question of whether there might be some theoretical consideration which would give support to the apparent relation between retroversion and ASB. The early work of Stockard (1921) with fish and later mammalian work (Murakami and Katsunuma, 1955;Degenhardt, 1956; Ingalls and ...