2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The outcome of displaced intracapsular hip fractures treated with cemented compared to uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The optimal treatment remains controversial. [2][3][4] For displaced femoral neck fractures, hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) achieve better functional outcome and fewer revision surgeries than internal fixation. 5 Nonetheless, there is no consensus for the use of a cemented or uncemented femoral stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The optimal treatment remains controversial. [2][3][4] For displaced femoral neck fractures, hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) achieve better functional outcome and fewer revision surgeries than internal fixation. 5 Nonetheless, there is no consensus for the use of a cemented or uncemented femoral stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Nonetheless, there is no consensus for the use of a cemented or uncemented femoral stem. [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Cemented femoral stems result in a better functional outcome and less pain than uncemented femoral stems, with no increased mortality at one month or one year. 5,8,13 Historically, fixation with acrylic bone cement has been associated with increased mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%