2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The outcome of all-inside meniscal repair with relation to previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were analysed 14–23. The studies assessed outcome via several different methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eleven studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were analysed 14–23. The studies assessed outcome via several different methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study defined failure as persistent effusions, mechanical symptoms or joint line tenderness 20. The remaining five papers defined failure as repeat surgery on the index meniscus 18 21–23. Various patient-reported outcome tools were used in seven papers, with only two studies commenting on differences in patient-reported outcomes based on patient sex 20 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 Past history of ACLR is associated with a more than three-fold increased risk of re-operation for meniscal repair (p < 0.016), which may be a result of inadequate ACLR graft, but this hypothesis requires further confirmation. 58 Complications following ramp repair are rare and there are not many different types. Most common complications include symptoms related to inflammatory processes such as swelling, pain, nerve irritation, etc.…”
Section: Post-operative Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Meniscal repair after ACLR has a significantly higher failure rate. 19 There are strategies currently employed to prevent the intraoperative tibiofemoral translation. First, the assistant can externally rotate the foot, preventing internal tibial rotation; however, this does not prevent anterior tibial translation.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 99%