2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1537592714003582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Other Welfare: Supplemental Security Income and U.S. Social Policy. By Edward D. Berkowitz and Larry DeWitt. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013. 296p. $45.00.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1634 versus 209(b) options for Medicaid date back to the creation of SSI in 1972. States were given the option to adopt the new federal eligibility and benefit levels for SSI and Medicaid, or to offer eligibility and benefits at least as generous as what the state offered in 1972 (Berkowitz & DeWitt, 2013;Gurny et al, 1992). Since then, SSI Medicaid policies have remained largely static to the option states chose initially, likely due to both funding constraints and policy inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1634 versus 209(b) options for Medicaid date back to the creation of SSI in 1972. States were given the option to adopt the new federal eligibility and benefit levels for SSI and Medicaid, or to offer eligibility and benefits at least as generous as what the state offered in 1972 (Berkowitz & DeWitt, 2013;Gurny et al, 1992). Since then, SSI Medicaid policies have remained largely static to the option states chose initially, likely due to both funding constraints and policy inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, unemployment insurance schemes are run by states and are vulnerable to both state finances (often requiring federal loans in recessions) and state politics (such as cuts and administrative burdens made by Republicans who view them as welfare rather than insurance schemes) (Herd and Moynihan 2019). By contrast, social assistance for peoples with disabilities, Supplemental Security Income, is federal, and while that might theoretically produce some possible inefficiency, it is far more politically stable and sustainable because of the link to a federal social insurance program (Erkulwater 2006;Berkowitz and DeWitt 2013). Disability schemes everywhere tend to collect people who have experienced economic misfortune, often because their labor market and unemployment experiences contributed to ill health, but the greater generosity and more stable requirements of the federal programs might also help to explain their importance in the United States.…”
Section: Allocation Of Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%