2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Other in Me: Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation Changes the Mental Representation of the Self

Abstract: BackgroundRecent studies have shown that the well-known effect of multisensory stimulation on body-awareness can be extended to self-recognition. Seeing someone else’s face being touched at the same time as one’s own face elicits changes in the mental representation of the self-face. We sought to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms and the effects of interpersonal multisensory stimulation (IMS) on the mental representation of the self and others.Methodology/Principal FindingsParticipants saw an unfamil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
143
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(134 reference statements)
17
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These physiological changes are similar to skin conductance responses during familiar face recognition (Ellis, Young, & Koenken, 1993;Tranel & Damasio, 1985, 1988 and have been observed after synchronous, but not asynchronous, tactile stimulation with an unfamiliar face (see Tajadura-JimŽnez et al, 2012a). However, in contrast to the current experiments, this enfacement effect is also accompanied by changes in the perceptual processing of faces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These physiological changes are similar to skin conductance responses during familiar face recognition (Ellis, Young, & Koenken, 1993;Tranel & Damasio, 1985, 1988 and have been observed after synchronous, but not asynchronous, tactile stimulation with an unfamiliar face (see Tajadura-JimŽnez et al, 2012a). However, in contrast to the current experiments, this enfacement effect is also accompanied by changes in the perceptual processing of faces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This was investigated by comparing a stimulation condition in which observers' faces were stroked in synchrony with an other-race face with a neutral condition in which neither the observers nor the onscreen face were stroked. The enfacement illusion was measured with an established 15 questionnaire (Maister et al, 2013b;Tajadura-Jiménez, et al, 2012a), while racial prejudice was measured implicitly with the IAT (Greenwald et al, 1998) and with the explicit racial prejudice scale (Lepore & Brown, 1997). Observers' scores in the enfacement questionnaire indicated a persistent subjective enfacement effect after SMS that was evident in seven out of eight items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, faces are also susceptible to rubber hand-like effects (see, e.g., Maister, Tsiakkas, & Tsakiris, 2013b;Sforza, Bufalari, Haggard, & Aglioti, 2010;Tajadura-Jiménez, Grehl, & Tsakiris, 2012a;Tsakiris, 2008). When observers' own faces are stroked in synchrony with a target face, they tend to perceive the target face as more similar to their own (see, e.g., Paladino, Mazzurega, Pavini, & Schubert, 2010;Sforza et al, 2010;TajaduraJiménez et al, 2012a;Tsakiris, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies by Tsakiris (2008) 32) and Tajadura-Jimenez et al (2012) 33) , subjects' faces were stroked while they were looking at a morphing face being touched in synchrony. After this visuo-tactile conflict, subjects felt as if the morphing face was their own.…”
Section: Multisensory Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%