1990
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199072090-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The osteogenic response to distant skeletal injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
52
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, a 10-day tibial distraction produced a measurable systemic anabolic effect on bone remodeling when compared to the values measured during the following consolidation phase in the same animals ( Table 1). The results of this experiment confirm previously performed studies examining the systemic influence of local skeletal injury [3,4,8,10,12,16,24,25,32] (Table 2). Our results demonstrate the quick onset of systemic stimulation of bone metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, a 10-day tibial distraction produced a measurable systemic anabolic effect on bone remodeling when compared to the values measured during the following consolidation phase in the same animals ( Table 1). The results of this experiment confirm previously performed studies examining the systemic influence of local skeletal injury [3,4,8,10,12,16,24,25,32] (Table 2). Our results demonstrate the quick onset of systemic stimulation of bone metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Causes for the systemic stimulatory effect are believed to be mainly due to the release of local growth factors and to a lesser extent to hormonal changes occurring in the course of bony injury and the subsequent repair [5,10,22]. The injury of the bone marrow is regarded as the trigger of this process [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our original intention was to use the contralateral limb as the control, but it is clear from these studies that this is not the best control. Remote remodeling and bone density effects have been observed previously in several situations, including marrow ablation, fracture healing and blood loss [3,8,9,20], although the only other reported effect on remote bone regeneration (as opposed to remodeling) is our study with TGF-B2 [25]. It does not seem likely that BMP released from the implant had a direct effect on the contralateral site because for bone ingrowth there was a trend toward the greatest contralateral effect to be associated with the lowest dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%