2018
DOI: 10.1159/000493106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Osteogenic Potential of the Neural Crest Lineage May Contribute to Craniosynostosis

Abstract: The craniofacial skeleton is formed from the neural crest and mesodermal lineages, both of which contribute mesenchymal precursors during formation of the skull bones. The large majority of cranial sutures also includes a proportion of neural crest-derived mesenchyme. While some studies have addressed the relative healing abilities of neural crest and mesodermal bone, relatively little attention has been paid to differences in intrinsic osteogenic potential. Here, we use mouse models to compare neural crest os… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contributions of neural crest cells to mouse skull vault have been studies recently . With the initiation of neural crests patterning to osteogenic lineage tracking, different transcriptional factors were found critical, such as Runx2, Osterix, Msx2, and Dlx5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contributions of neural crest cells to mouse skull vault have been studies recently . With the initiation of neural crests patterning to osteogenic lineage tracking, different transcriptional factors were found critical, such as Runx2, Osterix, Msx2, and Dlx5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestedly, frontal bone‐derived osteoblasts are found less differentiated, faster growing, and faster bone nodule forming compared to parietal bone‐derived osteoblasts in vitro . Besides, frontal bone osteoblasts exhibited superior osteogenic capacities, displaying superior abilities for bone regeneration to heal damaged bone in vivo. Therefore, the skull vault is a suitable model to study osteogenic potential, and the identifications of proper targets to manipulate osteogenic potential will be valuable to treat bone defects in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between CNC-derived osteoblasts and mesoderm-derived osteoblasts has been demonstrated in vitro (Xu et al, 2007), namely, CNC-derived osteoblasts display robust proliferation, and the extent of the cell differentiation is much less, and the extent of bone formation is faster compared to mesoderm-derived osteoblasts, exhibiting minimal capacities of bone nodules formation in vitro (Xu et al, 2007). When mesoderm-derived osteoblasts are cultured with the addition of CNC-derived osteoblasts, the inferior performance of ossification in mesoderm-derived osteoblasts have been improved (Doro et al, 2019), suggesting that CNC input can favor the osteogenic capacities and the extent of ossification (Doro et al, 2019) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Bmp Signaling In Tissue-derived Osteoblasts the Calvarial Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, a suitable cytokine or drug would be sufficient to initiate the endogenous program for bone healing. FGF and Wnt signaling are able to quicken bone healing from injury (Xu et al, 2007;Quarto et al, 2009Quarto et al, , 2010Quarto et al, , 2018Behr et al, 2010;Ichikawa et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2017;Doro et al, 2019). BMPs, receptors, and intracellular Smads have robust expressions in the periosteum after a fracture, and their expressions are detectable in endothelial cells that associated with new bone formation (Yu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Bmp Signaling In Calvarial Regeneration Bmps and Calvarial Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation