2010
DOI: 10.1177/1948550610363162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Orthogonality of Praise and Condemnation in Moral Judgment

Abstract: The present studies examined whether the tendency to praise others for positive (i.e., moral) behaviors correlates with the tendency to condemn others for negative (i.e., immoral) behaviors. Across three studies, factor analyses revealed that these tendencies are orthogonal. The results refute the hypothesis that simply caring deeply about morality leads individuals to praise moral behaviors and condemn immoral ones. The research instead suggests that individuals who are most praising of positive behavior are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosticity is deeply rooted in the attributional structure of the situation, and in particular the attributional schemas attached to the moral domain (Reeder & Brewer 1979). In the case of morality (and related domains such as prejudice or the environment), this is reflected in the traditional distinction made in ethics between perfect and imperfect duties (Kant 2002, Wiltermuth et al 2010. Imperfect duties are desirable feats for a good person-but not performing them does not impugn your morality.…”
Section: Ambiguity Of the Initial And Target Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosticity is deeply rooted in the attributional structure of the situation, and in particular the attributional schemas attached to the moral domain (Reeder & Brewer 1979). In the case of morality (and related domains such as prejudice or the environment), this is reflected in the traditional distinction made in ethics between perfect and imperfect duties (Kant 2002, Wiltermuth et al 2010. Imperfect duties are desirable feats for a good person-but not performing them does not impugn your morality.…”
Section: Ambiguity Of the Initial And Target Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, we do not view these vignettes as measuring every aspect of morality. Our vignettes focuses specifically on judgment of third-party moral violations, as opposed to separable dimensions such as moral praise (Wiltermuth, Monin, & Chow, 2010) or moral character (Chadwick, Bromgard, Bromgard, & Trafimow, 2006). …”
Section: Development Of a Standardized Stimulus Set Of Moral Vignettesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical leadership, defined as "the demonstration of normatively appropriate conduct through personal actions and interpersonal relationships, and the promotion of such conduct to followers through two-way communication, reinforcement, and decision-making" (Brown, Treviño, & Harrison 2005: 120), has the potential to encourage this type of positive engagement among employees. Ethical leadership encompasses both the morality of duty and obligation to avoid negative behaviors and the morality of aspiration and positive or praiseworthy behaviors (Wiltermuth, Monin, & Chow, 2010). Ethical leadership reduces the prevalence of negative characteristics of the work environments such as unethical behavior and relationship conflict (Mayer, Aquino, Greenbaum, & Kuenzi, 2012), and it contributes to the positive characteristics of the work environment such as employees enjoying their jobs (Neubert, Carlson, Kacmar, Roberts, & Chonko, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%