2022
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2146117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origins of Theory of Mind in Infant Social Cognition: Investigating Longitudinal Pathways from Intention Understanding and Joint Attention to Preschool Theory of Mind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although subtle atypicalities in RJA instances, like shorter duration of first fixation at the object of joint attention, persist along the lifespan (Falck‐Ytter et al, 2015; Freeth et al, 2010; Swanson et al, 2013; Swanson & Siller, 2013, 2014) and may be related to atypical neural correlates of RJA in ASD, the frequency of RJA acts tends to align to typical levels with development (Chawarska et al, 2003; Mundy et al, 1994; Nation & Penny, 2008). IJA is in turn more often identified as atypical in ASD using a simple measurement like frequency of occurrence at different ages and has been considered a more stable marker of ASD and a stronger predictor of downstream social‐cognitive development than RJA (Brandone & Stout, 2023; Ibañez et al, 2013; Mundy et al, 2009; Nyström et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although subtle atypicalities in RJA instances, like shorter duration of first fixation at the object of joint attention, persist along the lifespan (Falck‐Ytter et al, 2015; Freeth et al, 2010; Swanson et al, 2013; Swanson & Siller, 2013, 2014) and may be related to atypical neural correlates of RJA in ASD, the frequency of RJA acts tends to align to typical levels with development (Chawarska et al, 2003; Mundy et al, 1994; Nation & Penny, 2008). IJA is in turn more often identified as atypical in ASD using a simple measurement like frequency of occurrence at different ages and has been considered a more stable marker of ASD and a stronger predictor of downstream social‐cognitive development than RJA (Brandone & Stout, 2023; Ibañez et al, 2013; Mundy et al, 2009; Nyström et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As joint attention entails recognizing what other people attend to, and supports learning about their communicative and action goals, it has been proposed to be a precursor of ToM. Indeed, several longitudinal studies have shown positive behavioral correlations between joint attention and ToM [37][38][39][40][41][42] . Further, ToM in older children and adults recruits brain regions partly overlapping with those of joint attention, including the mPFC, STS, and TPJ 43 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it critically shapes infants' capacity to learn from others and their acquisition of social cognitive skills. Indeed, several longitudinal studies have shown positive behavioral correlations between joint attention and ToM [36][37][38][39][40][41] . The role of joint attention in early social cognitive development suggests that the neural maturation supporting joint attention in infancy may be predictive of later-developing ToM capacity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%