The Origins of the Monetary Union in the United States

Rolnick, Arthur J.; Smith, Bruce D.; Weber, Warren E.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2720-6_12

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rolnick, Smith, and Weber (1993) argue that the United States went from fiat money systems to a commodity money standard to ensure fixed exchange rates between the colonies and to solve a seignorage incentive problem. While the same underlying forces motivated the establishment of central banks, these forces were filtered through different political, social, cultural and economic institutions.…”

Section: Convertible Notes and Central Bankingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anchors Aweigh: The Transition from Commodity Money to Fiat Money in Western Economies

Redish¹,

Url²

1993

The Canadian Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Abstract. In this paper I argue that the transition from commodity money to fiat money in the 1970s was a less dramatic change than suggested by a first glance at monetary history or monetary theory. I show that, historically, the quantity of the commodity-based money was at the discretion of the monetary authority and how, over time, the desire to economize on the commodity backing led to national and international institutions that reduced the extent to which money issues under the commodity standard represented an explicit claim to an intrinsically valuable asset. All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 778 Angela Redish early 1970s the last tie to the gold standard was broken when the Bretton Woods system collapsed, and the United States suspended convertibility of u.s. dollars into gold. Fiat money (for which I will use Wallace's (1980) definition: money that is inconvertible and intrinsically useless) was to be the basis of the monetary system. This paper analyses the transition from a commodity-based monetary system to the fiat money system. This choice of topic is motivated by both theoretical and historical factors. In theory, there seems to be a vast chasm between a commodity money system, where the quantity of money is determined by nature (possibly at some remove) and the value of money is intrinsic, and a fiat money system, where the determinants of value are puzzling and the quantity of money is a matter of policy. The historical motivation comes from my research into the origins of the Bank of Canada in the course of which I was struck by the confidence with which Canadian policy-makers in the early 1930s anticipated the resumption of the international gold standard (Bordo and Redish 1987). Why the change of heart?What I am going to present is unfortunately not a complete answer; rather, it is the foundation for a case that the process was more gradual than the simple comparison between attitudes in 1930 and 1970or than simple comparisons of economies with fiat money and commodity moneysuggests.The collapse of Bretton Woods has been studied extensively, primarily in the context of the post-World War ii economy, although sometimes in the context of interwar economic problems and even the classical gold standard. Here I study the evolution of the system in a broader context: as part of the evolution from a pure commodity money system to a fiat money system. My view of the collapse of Bretton Woods is the story of a ship on a finite anchor chain, in rising seas: At some point one has to cut the chain to save the ship. I will argue that the seas had been rising not just in the Bretton Woods period, but for many decades previouslyand indeed were the motivating force...

show abstract

Section: Convertible Notes and Central Bankingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anchors Aweigh: The Transition from Commodity Money to Fiat Money in Western Economies

Redish¹,

Url²

1993

The Canadian Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The account of US monetary unification rests on i a the following contributions: McCallum (1992),Perkins (1995) Rolnick, Weber andSmith (1994) andFraas (1974).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of EMU: What Does the History of Monetary Unions Tell Us?

Bordo

Jonung

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The creation of EMU and the ECB has triggered a discussion of the future of EMU. Independent observers have pointed to a number of shortcomings or "hazard areas" in the construction of EMU, such as the absence of a central lender of last resort function for EMU, the lack of a central authority supervising the financial systems of EMU, unclear and inconsistent policy guidelines for the ECB, the absence of central co-ordination of fiscal policies within EMU, unduly strict criteria for domestic debt and deficits, as set out in the Maastricht rules, in the face of asymmetric shocks, and Euroland as not an "optimal" currency area.Do these "flaws" represent major threats to the future of EMU? Or will they be successfully resolved by the European policy authorities, leading to a lasting and prosperous EMU?We provide answers to these questions by examining the historical record of monetary unions. We try to extract the key conditions for establishing and for maintaining monetary unions intact. Our main lesson from the history of monetary unions is that political factors will be the central determinants of the future of EMU. The "economic" shortcomings of EMU will likely be overcome as long as political unity prevails within EMU.

show abstract

The Origins of the Monetary Union in the United States

Cited by 2 publications

References 16 publications

Anchors Aweigh: The Transition from Commodity Money to Fiat Money in Western Economies

Anchors Aweigh: The Transition from Commodity Money to Fiat Money in Western Economies

The Future of EMU: What Does the History of Monetary Unions Tell Us?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About