The Origins of the Ambivalent Acceptance of Divorce

Cherlin, Andrew J.

doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00593.x

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, there is a negative relationship between unemployment rates and divorce rates. The results obtained from studies conducted by Cherlin (1991), Amato & Beattie (2011), Hellerstein & Morrill (2011), Cohen (2014, Payne (2014), Gonz´alez-Val & Marc´en (2017, Schneider & Hastings (2015), Tumin & Qian (2015) and Alola et al (2020) were consistent with the divorce cost approach. Fischer & Liefbroer (2006) concluded that macroeconomic conditions and cultural climate changes affect divorce rates negatively.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Ekonomik Resesyonların Boşanma Oranları Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Koç

Kutlar

2021

Sosyoekonomi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses the relationship between short-and long-term relationships between divorce rates and economic recession in Turkey. The asymmetric and time-varying asymmetric causality tests are used to analyse the short-term relationship, the Maki cointegration test is used to analyse the long-term relationship. The dependent variable of the model is the divorce rate. Labour force participation rate of women, unemployment rate, GDP per capita, legal regulations, and economic crises are independent variables. According to the estimation results, unemployment, national income, legal regulations, and economic crises positively affect divorce rates. The timevarying asymmetric causality test results also indicate a temporary causality relationship between positive income and unemployment shocks.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Ekonomik Resesyonların Boşanma Oranları Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Koç

Kutlar

2021

Sosyoekonomi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The number of children being born to and raised by unmarried parents has risen substantially in recent years accompanied by a shift in understanding of the role of fathers in child development (Cherlin, 2009). It remains, however, integrating fathers into family and community health can be beneficial.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Friends, Family, and Foes

Murphy

Gordon

Sherrod³

et al. 2012

Am J Mens Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fathers can play an important role in child development and family functioning. However, little is known about the influence of paternal perceptions of fatherhood involvement or the influence of fathers’ peer networks. We explored the network characteristics (density, closeness, and degree centrality) and peer norms regarding sex, fatherhood, and other risk behaviors of 52 urban adult males in New Haven, Connecticut. Results identify that engagement in high-risk sexual behavior was associated with fatherhood involvement, with 88% of less involved fathers engaging in high-risk sexual behavior (p = .004). Denser networks were positively correlated with unfavorable peer norms such as cheating on a partner or drinking or using drugs (p < .05). Our findings suggest that peer networks are important to father’s health and behavior and that father’s behaviors may be affected by peer norms. Interventions designed for men may be strengthened by including peers in programming and by addressing norms and norm changing.

show abstract

“…Evidence supporting the theme of diverging destinies, defined as growing racial/ethnic and social class differentials in family behavior, often has focused on the disproportionate rise in nonmarital fertility among the most disadvantaged individuals versus the quite stable, low levels of unwed childbearing among college graduates (e.g., Cherlin, 2009;Ellwood & Jencks, 2004;McLanahan, 2004;Mincieli, Manlove, McGarrett, Moore, & Ryan, 2007;South, 1999). Similarly, there appears to be a divergence in marriage trends, as growth in nonmarriage has been greatest among the most disadvantaged (Ellwood & Jencks, 2004;Furstenberg, 2009;Schoen, Landale, Daniels, & Cheng, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation

Manning

Brown

Payne

2014

J of Marriage and Family

161

170

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The landscape of union formation has been shifting; Americans are now marrying at the highest ages on record and the majority of young adults have cohabited. Yet little attention has been paid to the timing of cohabitation relative to marriage. Using the National Survey of Families and Households and 4 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth, the authors examined the timing of marriage, cohabitation, and unions over 20 years. As the median age at first marriage has climbed, the age at cohabitation has remained stable for men and women. The changes in the timing of union formation have been similar according to race/ethnicity. The marked delay in marriage among women and men with low educational attainment has resulted in a near-convergence in the age at first marriage according to education. The authors conclude that the rise in cohabitation has offset changes in the levels and timing of marriage.

show abstract

The Origins of the Ambivalent Acceptance of Divorce

Cited by 16 publications

References 8 publications

Ekonomik Resesyonların Boşanma Oranları Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Ekonomik Resesyonların Boşanma Oranları Üzerindeki Etkileri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Friends, Family, and Foes

Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About