Social Bioarchaeology 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444390537.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origins of Biocultural Dimensions in Bioarchaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the biocultural approach in biological anthropology has greatly benefitted bioarchaeology by providing an integrating framework for inclusion of cultural and environmental context (see Martin et al, for an in depth review of the biocultural framework applied to bioarchaeological studies). The study of human remains (largely in the form of skeletonized bodies and body parts) is of value because it provides time depth on morbidity and mortality as well as information on biocultural interactions that complements other subdisciplines (Zuckerman and Armelagos, ). [This review only deals with skeletonized human remains.…”
Section: The Study Of Human Skeletal Remains – Bioarchaeology Paleopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the biocultural approach in biological anthropology has greatly benefitted bioarchaeology by providing an integrating framework for inclusion of cultural and environmental context (see Martin et al, for an in depth review of the biocultural framework applied to bioarchaeological studies). The study of human remains (largely in the form of skeletonized bodies and body parts) is of value because it provides time depth on morbidity and mortality as well as information on biocultural interactions that complements other subdisciplines (Zuckerman and Armelagos, ). [This review only deals with skeletonized human remains.…”
Section: The Study Of Human Skeletal Remains – Bioarchaeology Paleopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of skeletons from archaeological sites, or bioarchaeology, provides an opportunity to explore human health and disease in the past using direct evidence (e.g., Buikstra 1977Buikstra , 1991Larsen 1997;Zuckerman and Armelagos 2011). The field focuses on excavated human remains from funerary contexts such as cemeteries and crypts ranging in date from prehistory to the early modern period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molleson 1989) and palaeopathology (Lallo, Armelagos, and Mensforth 1977;Mensforth et al 1978;Cook and Buikstra 1979). The biocultural approach continues to be the dominant model for understanding the past through human remains (Zuckerman and Armelagos 2011). Despite this approach's emphasis on human interaction with the sociocultural as well as the physical environment, until the last decade there has been a tendency for bioarchaeological research to operate largely divorced from developments within social theory.…”
Section: The Social Bioarchaeology Of the Childmentioning
confidence: 99%