2013
DOI: 10.1179/0307013112z.00000000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The original source for Tzimiskes’ Balkan campaign (971 AD) and the emperor’s classicizing propaganda

Abstract: For their account of Ioannes Tzimiskes’ Balkan campaign of 971 AD against the Rus, Leon the Deacon and Ioannes Skylitzes independently used a common source that was written soon after the emperor’s triumph in Constantinople. This source classicized the emperor and his actions, drawing upon figures from the Roman Republic and including speeches and geographical digressions. This source accounts for the bulk of what we know of Tzimiskes’ reign.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leo, for example, and later Skylitzes used a panegyrical and highly classicizing source for their account of Tzimiskes' Balkan wars that was probably written in 971 in connection with that emperor's triumph (albeit now lost). 20 And no one would have guessed the existence of an idiosyncratic text such as Theodosios the Deacon's Capture of Crete had it not survived in one manuscript. It is possible that the Continuator (i.e., likely Symeon himself) had written a separate, fuller, and classicizing (Prokopian) account of the conquest of Crete that he later used when extending his Chronicle down to 963.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leo, for example, and later Skylitzes used a panegyrical and highly classicizing source for their account of Tzimiskes' Balkan wars that was probably written in 971 in connection with that emperor's triumph (albeit now lost). 20 And no one would have guessed the existence of an idiosyncratic text such as Theodosios the Deacon's Capture of Crete had it not survived in one manuscript. It is possible that the Continuator (i.e., likely Symeon himself) had written a separate, fuller, and classicizing (Prokopian) account of the conquest of Crete that he later used when extending his Chronicle down to 963.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%